RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big!

RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

SternSkipper -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 3:46:12 PM)
quote: What are you talking about? I'm talking about the U.S. In New York specifically, Obama's already won the election, and by at least 20 points. Oh, sorry I just assume that when someone is talking about presidential elections with another American, and they use "here", it's sort of a reasonable presumption they are speaking in regional terms. And yeah, I'm pretty well aware of the projections for the northeast.

Musicmystery -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 3:47:01 PM)
I didn't use "here." You read it anyway.

wittynamehere -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 3:50:18 PM)
~FR~ Looks like it'll be Obama going up against Ron Paul in November. Which is great, because Obama has trouble beating Ron Paul in hypothetical head to head polling. He kicks Romney's ass every time, though.

Musicmystery -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 3:52:49 PM)
Ron Paul only exists in hypothetical situations.

SternSkipper -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 4:44:54 PM)
quote: Looks like it'll be Obama going up against Ron Paul in November. Which is great, because Obama has trouble beating Ron Paul in hypothetical head to head polling. He kicks Romney's ass every time, though. What are you smoking? Can you take a cellphone picture of the plant matter and post it here so we can have a look?

SternSkipper -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 4:54:43 PM)
quote: I didn't use "here." You read it anyway. You did, but it was starting a sentence where you you typed in "independents" and I now understand that you meant "Here" refer to independents. I think that "independents" being lower case cause me to discount it somehow, I apologize. Been a tough day... I have spent the WHOLE middle of the day arguing in front of a senate candidate why despite the new volunteer coordinator's insightful testimony (how many fucking times do you throw "I used to admin a linux server' in an effort to justify a horrible idea?)... arguing that a US Senate Campaign SHOULDN'T Maintain it's internal calendar on Google Calendar. Anyway, my bad.

thompsonx -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 6:15:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 ...small infrequent moments of perceived joy/comfort Like when Baroccoli O’Fuckup FARTS (i.e., babbles) and the idiotic Left fall all over themselves (e.g., Chris “Drooling-Thrill-Up-My-Leg” Matthews), in a fevered attempt to sneak the smallest wiff -- savoring every aromatic, moronic morsel?!! [:D] JOY!!! Aside from having bigger ears and being more artculat how exactly does the current president differ from the previous one? Are we still in gitmo? Are we still in the sand box? Same shit different flys

thompsonx -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 6:17:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tennisman2388 Historically, the majority of undecides swing toward the challenger, the incumbent's record having been well established. Would you happen to have any validation for this ...otherwise it is just insipid tripe

LookieNoNookie -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 7:08:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY He won 57.9% of the vote in the Democrat only primary here. Of course, his opponent was "anyone but Obama", who got all the rest of the vote. [8D] Firm Sorry...misread...I thought you'd said Obama won the Kentucky Derby. (My error).

FirmhandKY -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 8:44:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam My first thought when I read this was "Do they even HAVE Democrats in Kentucky?" There's like 12 of em right? [image]http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/fzuziam16eqskuw-v2ipba.jpg[/image] From 2008, the last Prez election. Kentucky is "solid Democratic". Firm

Musicmystery -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 8:48:33 PM)
Where did you get that map? Not even close. [image]http://accurateshooter.net/Blog/votemap2.png[/image]

FirmhandKY -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 8:50:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subspaceseven Then what does your reasoning say about Willard???? I did not vote in the primary, no reason to. We have our pick, look at how poorly Willard did against people on book tours. The vote is in Nov, and pollsters can make anyone look good or bad, well at least that is what 53% of them say Who is "Willard"? What do you mean "pollsters can make anyone look good or bad"? The thread and article is about the STATE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY. In which the incumbent is running, and in which the most dedicated party members go to register "something" other than choosing between two differing party candidates, because there isn't two or more party candidates to choose from. The fact that a third of those dedicated party members show up, just to vote "anyone but the incumbent" can be interpreted only one way, by any reasonable person. Firm

FirmhandKY -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 8:53:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Where did you get that map? Not even close. State of the States: Political Party Affiliation Pay attention, MM. Hill said he wasn't aware of many Democrats in Kentucky. My graphic addresses that. Yours doesn't. You are on a different subject. Firm

Musicmystery -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 8:53:37 PM)
quote: can be interpreted only one way, by any reasonable person. Must be nice to live such a simple minded life.

Musicmystery -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 8:54:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Where did you get that map? Not even close. State of the States: Political Party Affiliation Pay attention, MM. Hill said he wasn't aware of many Democrats in Kentucky. My graphic addresses that. Yours doesn't. You are on a different subject. Firm Then why are you using 2008 data? [image]http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/map.jpg[/image]

FirmhandKY -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 8:55:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Where did you get that map? Not even close. State of the States: Political Party Affiliation Pay attention, MM. Hill said he wasn't aware of many Democrats in Kentucky. My graphic addresses that. Yours doesn't. You are on a different subject. Firm Then why are you using 2008 data? Because the party affiliation is still about the same? [8\|] Firm

FirmhandKY -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 8:57:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: can be interpreted only one way, by any reasonable person. Must be nice to live such a simple minded life. Note my adjective in front of the direct object. Firm

Musicmystery -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 8:59:31 PM)
quote: Because the party affiliation is still about the same? Firm You'll note it's not. [image]http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/map.jpg[/image]

Musicmystery -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 9:01:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: can be interpreted only one way, by any reasonable person. Must be nice to live such a simple minded life. Note my adjective in front of the direct object. Firm OK. Must be nice to live such an ego-centric life.

FirmhandKY -> RE: Obama Wins Kentucky Dem Primary - Big! (5/23/2012 9:11:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: Because the party affiliation is still about the same? Firm You'll note it's not. Want to argue what the definition of "is", is? [8\|] Firm

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.078125