Iamsemisweet
Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011 From: The Great Northwest, USA Status: offline
|
I would be happy to answer that. Just a practice doesn't. I don't think Romney shouldn't be elected because his church practices baptism for the dead ( although what kind of an idiot believes in crap like that). However, the Mormon church is structured differently than most churches. Instead of a paid, regular clergy, the priesthood holders ( all men, naturally) take the leadership roles. Romney was a bishop, and engaged in some pretty odd behaviors. To me, that is a little different than just sitting in the pews. Here is an article that discusses this a little more. http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/2012/02/mitt-romney-201202 quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 What`s so objectionable about that guy? Specifically. I'll just refer you to Google for an answer to your question, Owner59. Once you are up to speed, you can then explain how a practice within Romney's faith reflects more about him, than what was being said from the particular pulpit, in front of the particular pew, where President Obama chose to sit over the course of 20 odd years, should have reflected onto him. To my mind, the whole practice smacks of a way to separate the gullible believers from their coin, but temples and custom robes, and towers for the call to prayer to be shouted from, don't come cheap in any religion.
_____________________________
Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people. The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad. Alice: How do you know I'm mad? The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.
|