Securing our southern border (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Hillwilliam -> Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 6:31:41 AM)

All the candidates are promising to do it but can it be done, at what cost and how?

http://news.yahoo.com/promises-promises-securing-us-border-impossible-071019604.html




Moonhead -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 8:52:26 AM)

Nuking Mexico is the obvious answer. If it irradiated the gulf of Mexico, that'd shut up the fisheries whining about pollution so you could drill for more offshore oil as well.




vincentML -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 8:56:32 AM)

From the article: "Ron Paul pledges to secure the nation's southern border by any means necessary" His campaign website remarks: "As long as our borders remain wide open, the security and safety of the American people are at stake." REALLY?

The 9/11 attackers did not come across the southern border. Yet, only the southern border is of concern. Not the border with Oh! Canada, nor the coastlines east and west. These repubs are conflating national security with illegal immigration and drug running. Cannot imagine stationing our Armed Forces for decades and en mass along our southern border. Like shooting a frog with a cannon.

Disappointing to see Congressman Paul issuing the same demogoguery as his opponents.




Moonhead -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 9:02:34 AM)

What else is he going to do when he wants the same chunk of the electorate as his opponents are chasing to vote for him?




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 9:35:07 AM)

It depends on what you mean by "securing". 99.99% secure? Possible but not worth the cost. Secure enough to make the risk of crossing not worth the cost/benefits? Easily. A combination of fence, surveillance and a highly mobile security force. And by limiting the cost/benefit of crossing you reduce the general flow enough to be able to focus and be more effective in stemming the more dangerous.

And the northern border bullshit has been debunked many times. No need to revisit unfounded accusations of racism.




Owner59 -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 10:23:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

All the candidates are promising to do it but can it be done, at what cost and how?

http://news.yahoo.com/promises-promises-securing-us-border-impossible-071019604.html

It`s the republican version of promising the moon to someone.

Not possible but it sounds really really romantic when they say it.




popeye1250 -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 11:10:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

It depends on what you mean by "securing". 99.99% secure? Possible but not worth the cost. Secure enough to make the risk of crossing not worth the cost/benefits? Easily. A combination of fence, surveillance and a highly mobile security force. And by limiting the cost/benefit of crossing you reduce the general flow enough to be able to focus and be more effective in stemming the more dangerous.

And the northern border bullshit has been debunked many times. No need to revisit unfounded accusations of racism.



As of last year illegal aliens cost us $114 B. so we can't afford not to secure that border with Mexico a third world country and gateway to other third world countries.
The cheapest and most effective way to secure (close) that border is with minefields and Troops.
Minefields are *extremely* effective at "area denial." Also, they have mines that can detect any tunneling and explode and collapse the tunnel.
We use our mines right now in S. Korea to guard (their) border and they work very well, you don't hear of hundreds of N. Koreans sneaking into S. Korea every night, do you?
And one thing that people can't argue is that minefields are "inhumane." If you don't walk into a minefield you won't get blown up will you?
And with all this talk about "human rights" these days where are the "human rights" of U.S. Citizens not to have out country invaded by millions of illegal aliens?
Where is the "U.N." on this issue???
Their *silence* is deafening!
Do they plan on making a statement or what? Anyone know?




mnottertail -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 11:17:55 AM)

Yeah, a guy retired from the Coast Guard  whos tour higlights included, waterboarding and spanning the largest influx of illegal aliens in this country is telling us how to solve it, easy peasy.

What's wrong with this little vignette?




thompsonx -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 12:42:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

All the candidates are promising to do it but can it be done, at what cost and how?

http://news.yahoo.com/promises-promises-securing-us-border-impossible-071019604.html


I have stated this more than a few times Perhaps you were in the shit house and missed it.
The penality for crossing the border into the us illegally is a misdemeanor.
The penality for hiring someone who crosses the border illegally is a felony that carries a $250,000 fine and 5 years in the federal joint (no parole) for each illegal.
Enforce this federal law and there will be no one crossing the border illegally to get a job.
Yes local cops are allowed to enforce federal law.





mnottertail -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 12:46:27 PM)

But we still argue whether or not our fuckin constitution is strong enough to keep us american.

like that asswipe about terrorists (foreign or domestic---as if there is a difference) and that they have to be tried by the military and kept by the military.

When did ww give up the executive and judicial branches of this triumvirate and leave it all to lobbysts, corporations and fuckwads running for office? 




thompsonx -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 12:49:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

It depends on what you mean by "securing". 99.99% secure? Possible but not worth the cost. Secure enough to make the risk of crossing not worth the cost/benefits? Easily. A combination of fence, surveillance and a highly mobile security force. And by limiting the cost/benefit of crossing you reduce the general flow enough to be able to focus and be more effective in stemming the more dangerous.

And the northern border bullshit has been debunked many times. No need to revisit unfounded accusations of racism.



As of last year illegal aliens cost us $114 B.

This has been debunked so many times it is hardly worth mentioning. Either post up some proof of this drivel or stop taking up bandwidth.

so we can't afford not to secure that border with Mexico a third world country and gateway to other third world countries.[

You mean third world countries like lictenstien and monaco?



The cheapest and most effective way to secure (close) that border is with minefields and Troops.

I have stated this more than a few times Perhaps you were in the shit house and missed it.
The penality for crossing the border into the us illegally is a misdemeanor.
The penality for hiring someone who crosses the border illegally is a felony that carries a $250,000 fine and 5 years in the federal joint (no parole) for each illegal.
Enforce this federal law and there will be no one crossing the border illegally to get a job.
Yes local cops are allowed to enforce federal law.





Minefields are *extremely* effective at "area denial." Also, they have mines that can detect any tunneling and explode and collapse the tunnel.
We use our mines right now in S. Korea to guard (their) border and they work very well, you don't hear of hundreds of N. Koreans sneaking into S. Korea every night, do you?

That is one of their problems. The north infiltrates the south on regular bassis and the mine fields and troops don't seem to be able to stop them....
but:
Somehow you think it would work here?




thompsonx -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 12:53:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

But we still argue whether or not our fuckin constitution is strong enough to keep us american.

No one with a three digit iq does.

like that asswipe about terrorists (foreign or domestic---as if there is a difference) and that they have to be tried by the military and kept by the military.

Criminals need to be tried in criminal courts not military tribunals.

When did ww give up the executive and judicial branches of this triumvirate and leave it all to lobbysts, corporations and fuckwads running for office? 

With the "election" of thomas jefferson we have the beginnings of this shit and it has been downhill ever since.





mnottertail -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 1:08:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Criminals need to be tried in criminal courts not military tribunals.


It seems to me that I read something about that, there was a provision for that sort of activity in something called a fuckin constitution...something; an ideal  (rightly, wrongly) I thought I was defending implementing upholding and all that...  




BoxwineForBrunch -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 1:28:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

From the article: "Ron Paul pledges to secure the nation's southern border by any means necessary" His campaign website remarks: "As long as our borders remain wide open, the security and safety of the American people are at stake." REALLY?

The 9/11 attackers did not come across the southern border. Yet, only the southern border is of concern. Not the border with Oh! Canada, nor the coastlines east and west. These repubs are conflating national security with illegal immigration and drug running. Cannot imagine stationing our Armed Forces for decades and en mass along our southern border. Like shooting a frog with a cannon.

Disappointing to see Congressman Paul issuing the same demogoguery as his opponents.


sounds about right. ron paul is a crazy racist and wanting to keep scary foreigners out "by any means necessary" is something i'd expect a crazy racist to rabidly endorse.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 4:15:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

It depends on what you mean by "securing". 99.99% secure? Possible but not worth the cost. Secure enough to make the risk of crossing not worth the cost/benefits? Easily. A combination of fence, surveillance and a highly mobile security force. And by limiting the cost/benefit of crossing you reduce the general flow enough to be able to focus and be more effective in stemming the more dangerous.

And the northern border bullshit has been debunked many times. No need to revisit unfounded accusations of racism.



As of last year illegal aliens cost us $114 B. so we can't afford not to secure that border with Mexico a third world country and gateway to other third world countries.
The cheapest and most effective way to secure (close) that border is with minefields and Troops.
Minefields are *extremely* effective at "area denial." Also, they have mines that can detect any tunneling and explode and collapse the tunnel.
We use our mines right now in S. Korea to guard (their) border and they work very well, you don't hear of hundreds of N. Koreans sneaking into S. Korea every night, do you?
And one thing that people can't argue is that minefields are "inhumane." If you don't walk into a minefield you won't get blown up will you?
And with all this talk about "human rights" these days where are the "human rights" of U.S. Citizens not to have out country invaded by millions of illegal aliens?
Where is the "U.N." on this issue???
Their *silence* is deafening!
Do they plan on making a statement or what? Anyone know?


I dont know if its me who should be frightened or the US/world in general but I am agreeing with you too damn much lately.




tj444 -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 4:29:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
It depends on what you mean by "securing". 99.99% secure? Possible but not worth the cost. Secure enough to make the risk of crossing not worth the cost/benefits? Easily. A combination of fence, surveillance and a highly mobile security force. And by limiting the cost/benefit of crossing you reduce the general flow enough to be able to focus and be more effective in stemming the more dangerous.

And the northern border bullshit has been debunked many times. No need to revisit unfounded accusations of racism.

As of last year illegal aliens cost us $114 B. so we can't afford not to secure that border with Mexico a third world country and gateway to other third world countries.
The cheapest and most effective way to secure (close) that border is with minefields and Troops.
Minefields are *extremely* effective at "area denial." Also, they have mines that can detect any tunneling and explode and collapse the tunnel.
We use our mines right now in S. Korea to guard (their) border and they work very well, you don't hear of hundreds of N. Koreans sneaking into S. Korea every night, do you?
And one thing that people can't argue is that minefields are "inhumane." If you don't walk into a minefield you won't get blown up will you?
And with all this talk about "human rights" these days where are the "human rights" of U.S. Citizens not to have out country invaded by millions of illegal aliens?
Where is the "U.N." on this issue???
Their *silence* is deafening!
Do they plan on making a statement or what? Anyone know?

oh... dont forget gaters.. there are lots of gaters and crocs in FL.. all ya need to do is dig a moat along the border and fill with water and gaters.. lots and lots and lots of gaters and crocs.. it would be its own ecosystem.. Mexicans try to cross and.. well.. feed the gaters.. sort of like guard dogs but with webbed feets.. and big teeth.. and scary snapping jaws... (shivers..) It shouldnt take more than a year to complete with those troops from Iraq coming back and needing work.. [8|]




Hillwilliam -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 4:45:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

All the candidates are promising to do it but can it be done, at what cost and how?

http://news.yahoo.com/promises-promises-securing-us-border-impossible-071019604.html


I have stated this more than a few times Perhaps you were in the shit house and missed it.
The penality for crossing the border into the us illegally is a misdemeanor.
The penality for hiring someone who crosses the border illegally is a felony that carries a $250,000 fine and 5 years in the federal joint (no parole) for each illegal.
Enforce this federal law and there will be no one crossing the border illegally to get a job.
Yes local cops are allowed to enforce federal law.



I'm not interested in your opinion nearly so much as I'm interested in how some of these people will support the plans put forth in the article. It should be entertaining.

As for what you have posted before.....unless it was in answer to something I have said, I typically treat it the same way I treat the sound of My bloodhound farting.

I move to the other side of the room and try to pretend it didn't happen.




kdsub -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 4:58:10 PM)

Make our economy less attractive with new laws and penalties and enforcement or aid the Mexican government to help increase their local economy and opportunities.

Butch




slvemike4u -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 5:05:43 PM)

Seems to me the Republicans have lomg been at work on that making "our economy less attractive" thing .[:D]




Winterapple -> RE: Securing our southern border (12/6/2011 5:38:42 PM)

On land: A great stone wall manned by Oompa Loopas on fire breathing dragons.
At sea: Oompa Loopas on man eating sea
monsters.
It can't be done. The candidates who say
it can be are either lying to the dim
or are dim themselves.
As long as there are reasons to come
people will come.
Political candidates on the right talk out
of both sides of their mouths on this one.
They stir up and cater to the fear and bigotry
of the rank and file. They exploit the fear
and promise a solution they can't deliver to
get votes.
Out of the other side of their mouths they
tell the businessmen don't worry about it.
Enforcement of federal laws against hiring
illegal workers would not stop but would
decrease the number. But is that good for
business? Will the fruit get picked? Will
the dishes get washed?
If it's about security the northern border
is just as important to. Will the Canadians
be nice about troops and minefields?
How many troops will be needed? And
where are they coming from? Army?
National Guard?





Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
2.734375E-02