Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/23/2011 12:50:58 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
quote:

GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power
WASHINGTON (AP) — Most of the Republican presidential candidates want to wipe away lifetime tenure for federal judges, cut the budgets of courts that displease them or allow Congress to override Supreme Court rulings on constitutional issues.Any one of those proposals would significantly undercut the independence and authority of federal judges. Many of the ideas have been advanced before in campaigns to court conservative voters.http://news.yahoo.com/gop-candidates-cut-federal-judges-power-131852484.html;_ylt=AifBsqfX4X2VmeZVQxtqnVys0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTNtN3U0ZnR2BG1pdANKdW1ib3Ryb24gRlAEcGtnA2FjYmU5MmRmLWU0ZTgtM2FlZS1iMWEyLWQ1Y2VlMzQyM2ViYQRwb3MDMwRzZWMDanVtYm90cm9uBHZlcgM3ZTBjZDUwMC1mZGFiLTExZTAtOWZmZC03NmRmNmQyMzkxMjA-;_ylg=X3oDMTFpNzk0NjhtBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdANob21lBHB0A3NlY3Rpb25z;_ylv=3



And the Republicans and conservatives call democrats NAZIs.


_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/23/2011 12:57:46 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

I invoke Godwins law

But not before saying, good idea - judges were meant to have limited power from the beginning, and their power has grown to where it is now practically unlimited in scope

Judges act like fucking Nazis these days, especially the leftist judges


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/23/2011 2:02:18 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I invoke Godwins law

But not before saying, good idea - judges were meant to have limited power from the beginning, and their power has grown to where it is now practically unlimited in scope

Judges act like fucking Nazis these days, especially the leftist judges



The People have lost all control over the judiciary.
The best way to regain that control is for *all* judges to be *elected* every four years.
Imagine owning a business and having an employee who tells you to go fuck your self in front of all the other employees, takes 20 weeks vacation every year, tells you how to run your business and makes a lot more money than "the boss?"


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/23/2011 2:39:25 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I invoke Godwins law

But not before saying, good idea - judges were meant to have limited power from the beginning, and their power has grown to where it is now practically unlimited in scope

Judges act like fucking Nazis these days, especially the leftist judges



The People have lost all control over the judiciary.
The best way to regain that control is for *all* judges to be *elected* every four years.
Imagine owning a business and having an employee who tells you to go fuck your self in front of all the other employees, takes 20 weeks vacation every year, tells you how to run your business and makes a lot more money than "the boss?"


The people were never meant to have any power over the judiciary. That's the entire point of having an independent judiciary.

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/23/2011 5:45:56 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I invoke Godwins law

But not before saying, good idea - judges were meant to have limited power from the beginning, and their power has grown to where it is now practically unlimited in scope

Judges act like fucking Nazis these days, especially the leftist judges



The People have lost all control over the judiciary.
The best way to regain that control is for *all* judges to be *elected* every four years.
Imagine owning a business and having an employee who tells you to go fuck your self in front of all the other employees, takes 20 weeks vacation every year, tells you how to run your business and makes a lot more money than "the boss?"


The people were never meant to have any power over the judiciary. That's the entire point of having an independent judiciary.


Ken, have you heard that little ditty, "A government by the people, for the people......."
It doesn't say, "A government by the judiciary, for the judiciary....."
It is *never* a good thing when a government or any part thereof wields power over the people.
They are our employees not the management and are in existence to do the bidding of "The People."
When the people don't have control over the government and the government tries to tell them what to do that's a dictatorship and probably a few other names that don't come to mind right now. I wonder what Thomas Jefferson would say about that?
So,.....if you were standing on the steps of the supreme court and one of the judges came out and told you to take your clothes off and start masturbating you'd do it?
Have you heard the term, "legislating from the bench?" Now that's not very "Independent" of them now is it?
The higher people go in position the more supervision they need.
Boy, who's the liberal here, you or me?


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/23/2011 7:59:43 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
on second thought they should be separated from the gubafia completely


< Message edited by Real0ne -- 10/23/2011 8:01:17 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/23/2011 8:11:20 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I invoke Godwins law

But not before saying, good idea - judges were meant to have limited power from the beginning, and their power has grown to where it is now practically unlimited in scope

Judges act like fucking Nazis these days, especially the leftist judges



Thats sort of true.

It was never meant to be judges outside of the commercial constitution!

They are part of government because that is internal to government.

Not external to people!

"In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."
Read more: http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/7th-amendment.html#ixzz1bfHIZ9U2



They (with exception to an invisibly thin thread), they abolished the common law within the government and construed that to abolish it for the people as well.

I posted before that the jury is the COURT and JUDGE at trials, for both the fact and the law.

Take note that no facts decided by the jury can be re-examined in any court of the united states, and that is ALL COURTS withing the 50 states ARE ALL within the united states and under th judiciary act!

Then take note they are silent on who gets to judge the law, that is because the jury can also judge the law!

The laws in one state were supposed to be valid in all states but try that stunt in court sometime and see how far it gets you.

It was in the articles of confederation and the constitution and I assure you that your state ignores that when it dips into their tax receipts!

YES!  Jury courts all the way, judges as 'ADVISORY" ONLY!




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/23/2011 8:14:18 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I invoke Godwins law

But not before saying, good idea - judges were meant to have limited power from the beginning, and their power has grown to where it is now practically unlimited in scope

Judges act like fucking Nazis these days, especially the leftist judges



The People have lost all control over the judiciary.
The best way to regain that control is for *all* judges to be *elected* every four years.
Imagine owning a business and having an employee who tells you to go fuck your self in front of all the other employees, takes 20 weeks vacation every year, tells you how to run your business and makes a lot more money than "the boss?"


The people were never meant to have any power over the judiciary. That's the entire point of having an independent judiciary.


Ken, have you heard that little ditty, "A government by the people, for the people......."
It doesn't say, "A government by the judiciary, for the judiciary....."
It is *never* a good thing when a government or any part thereof wields power over the people.
They are our employees not the management and are in existence to do the bidding of "The People."
When the people don't have control over the government and the government tries to tell them what to do that's a dictatorship and probably a few other names that don't come to mind right now. I wonder what Thomas Jefferson would say about that?
So,.....if you were standing on the steps of the supreme court and one of the judges came out and told you to take your clothes off and start masturbating you'd do it?
Have you heard the term, "legislating from the bench?" Now that's not very "Independent" of them now is it?
The higher people go in position the more supervision they need.
Boy, who's the liberal here, you or me?


Legislating from the bench is a conservative buzz word that means enforcing the high ideals this country was founded on. Without an independent judiciary the decisions of judges will be respected even less than they are now.

Judges exist not to do the bidding of the people but to be impartial arbters and protectors of the rights of all against the tyranny of the majority.

It's only far right reactionaries like you who do not understand the need for an independent judiciary.

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/23/2011 8:47:37 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
INDEPENDENT?

Are you kidding?

they are all part of one huge fucking corporation called the united states!

They are about as independent as 3m president, accounting, the board, etc etc.

man how can anyone even say something like that when they hob nob together.

the only time they are independent is when the other guy steps on their dick, then they get all sorts of independent LOL

do the bidding of the people my ass.

every see the oaths they take?  what a crock of shit.

Hell the people do not even elect them.

and who said ONE SUPREME fucking court set the standard for the who damn nation?  With judges we do not elect that the retards politicize.  (oh wait the CON said that!

There isnt too much shocks me out here but that came close.

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 10/23/2011 8:52:21 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/24/2011 12:56:38 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I invoke Godwins law

But not before saying, good idea - judges were meant to have limited power from the beginning, and their power has grown to where it is now practically unlimited in scope

Judges act like fucking Nazis these days, especially the leftist judges



The People have lost all control over the judiciary.
The best way to regain that control is for *all* judges to be *elected* every four years.
Imagine owning a business and having an employee who tells you to go fuck your self in front of all the other employees, takes 20 weeks vacation every year, tells you how to run your business and makes a lot more money than "the boss?"


The people were never meant to have any power over the judiciary. That's the entire point of having an independent judiciary.


Ken, have you heard that little ditty, "A government by the people, for the people......."
It doesn't say, "A government by the judiciary, for the judiciary....."
It is *never* a good thing when a government or any part thereof wields power over the people.
They are our employees not the management and are in existence to do the bidding of "The People."
When the people don't have control over the government and the government tries to tell them what to do that's a dictatorship and probably a few other names that don't come to mind right now. I wonder what Thomas Jefferson would say about that?
So,.....if you were standing on the steps of the supreme court and one of the judges came out and told you to take your clothes off and start masturbating you'd do it?
Have you heard the term, "legislating from the bench?" Now that's not very "Independent" of them now is it?
The higher people go in position the more supervision they need.
Boy, who's the liberal here, you or me?


Legislating from the bench is a conservative buzz word that means enforcing the high ideals this country was founded on. Without an independent judiciary the decisions of judges will be respected even less than they are now.

Judges exist not to do the bidding of the people but to be impartial arbters and protectors of the rights of all against the tyranny of the majority.

It's only far right reactionaries like you who do not understand the need for an independent judiciary.


Dom Ken, and who's going to police the judges?
Would you have liked to see George Bush with absolute power answerable to no-one?
And "legislating from the bench" can be used by any one or group. How do you ascribe it to conservatives?
And judges do work for The People, who pays their salaries and overly generous vacation and benefits? You "work" for whoever it is that pays you.
I think that The People need to have a lot more say in what our government does or doesn't do!
And you sound a lot more conservative than me in this exchange.
I want to change the government not "conserve" it like you. Who you voting for in the primary, Romney or Cain?


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/24/2011 4:43:33 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
From the link:

Minnesota Rep. Michelle Bachmann, in criticizing Iowa judges who ruled same-sex marriage legal in the state, described judges as "black-robed masters." Bachmann said Congress should prevent the courts from getting involved in the fight over same-sex marriage, among other high-profile social issues.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/24/2011 5:13:38 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Youve got it popeye

As long as these activist judges are activists for far left temper tantrum causes they can do no wrong, but watch the far lefts reaction if and when the tables are turned


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Dom Ken, and who's going to police the judges?
Would you have liked to see George Bush with absolute power answerable to no-one?
And "legislating from the bench" can be used by any one or group. How do you ascribe it to conservatives?
And judges do work for The People, who pays their salaries and overly generous vacation and benefits? You "work" for whoever it is that pays you.
I think that The People need to have a lot more say in what our government does or doesn't do!
And you sound a lot more conservative than me in this exchange.
I want to change the government not "conserve" it like you. Who you voting for in the primary, Romney or Cain?



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/24/2011 7:48:57 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
...have you heard that little ditty, "A government by the people, for the people......."



Yes, it was spoken by a man who forced federal sovereignty on the states via war, suspended habeus corpus, and imprisoned legislatures, and republican to boot.

And so somewhere in all that mess you haven't really got any sort of point.

Thanks for playing; parting gifts; door...

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/24/2011 8:10:18 AM   
hot4bondage


Posts: 403
Joined: 7/29/2009
Status: offline
I think "judicial activism" as a conservative talking point should have ended with the SCOTUS eminent domain ruling awhile back. They upheld legislation that takes land from the owner to sells it to someone who might bring more money to the community. They let that statist, collectivist, unconstitutional law stand! Any conservatives here ok with that?

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/24/2011 8:12:30 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Ron if you said that in a room with 20 people in it, how many ya figure would know who that is ?

T^T

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/24/2011 8:42:15 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Ibrahim Lyncoln

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/24/2011 9:44:38 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I invoke Godwins law

But not before saying, good idea - judges were meant to have limited power from the beginning, and their power has grown to where it is now practically unlimited in scope

Judges act like fucking Nazis these days, especially the leftist judges

Example please.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power - 10/24/2011 10:27:06 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
Dom Ken, and who's going to police the judges?
Would you have liked to see George Bush with absolute power answerable to no-one?
And "legislating from the bench" can be used by any one or group. How do you ascribe it to conservatives?
And judges do work for The People, who pays their salaries and overly generous vacation and benefits? You "work" for whoever it is that pays you.
I think that The People need to have a lot more say in what our government does or doesn't do!
And you sound a lot more conservative than me in this exchange.
I want to change the government not "conserve" it like you. Who you voting for in the primary, Romney or Cain?


Judges are already answerable to another part of government. The mechanic is one that cons, like you, are always eager to use so I don't see what the complaint is.

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 18
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> GOP candidates would cut federal judges' power Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.172