|
tweakabelle -> RE: Noam Chomsky turns on Hugo Chávez (7/4/2011 7:36:31 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 Sure....you and bush were alllll about freedom and democracy.......[8|] My recollection is that the only ones obsessed with Hugo on this forum, has been you cons. My guess is that Hugo gets lots of mentions in your rightist rags and you righties can`t help but regurgitate. Good point,Owner 59. If you look at how US foreign policy has actually panned out over the years - Mossedagh's Iran, Saddam's Iraq, Chavez' Venezuela, Nicaragua and the Contras, "Irangate", Mubarak's Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Israel/Palestine, especially Hamas in Gaza and so on - a commonality emerges. It's not whether the local government was democratic or not, or a dictatorship or not. It has nothing to do with human rights or promoting democracy or democratic values. The key factor that determines US policy towards foreign Governments is that Government's acquiescence to US demands and interests. If it's friendly towards US interests, if it complies with US demands it stays. If it opposes US interests it can expect destabilisation, coup attempts or invasion - all aimed at overthrowing those who stand up to US bullying and put their own country's interests first. Then replacing it with some puppet regime - it doesn't matter how evil or corrupt, look at Karzai in Afghanistan, or the Shah's Iran, or Saudi Arabia for example - that will bend over for the US whenever the US tells it to. Bushevik's support for democracy overseas extends as far as their bank balances and no further. If you're still a bit doubtful please ask the very nice patriotic Halliburton Corporation for a second opinion.
|
|
|
|