juliaoceania
Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006 From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow Status: offline
|
Seeing the threads that crop up here, and reading the "comments" section of online articles I read, I am struck by how many of us are moved to support people instead of the ideas that they advocate. It is as if one side can show that the other side has some sort of moral failing that everything that they stood for has now become less than it was and suspect. People are rallied on the basis of personality rather than ideas, and they will support a personality even more than they support their ideas. We have conflated political ideology, personal life of leaders, and popularity based upon image. I can actually like someone and dislike their ideology, I do not get the two confused. For example, I like Mike Huckleby. He is a charming and winning personality. He has a sense of humor, but I detest his politics. What I see is an ideation of what certain leaders embody, like Ronald Reagan, or Sarah Palin, but it is this idea of who they are and what they stand for, like caricatures of something. I suppose Obama has the same sort of support. Those who see him as this polished suave leader, a professor type, the "intellectual"... and that feeds into his mythos. I used to get into this mindset and defend people instead of their ideas, but then I had a relationship with a bona fide political activist, my first dom. He taught me an important lesson about politics... if you stand up for your ideas instead of the people who are vocalizing them, you will get further in realizing them. We all have clay feet. None of us are perfect. If we get caught up in personalities instead of our ideas we lose sight of the larger picture. I do not think the personal life of most of the politicians in this country matters as long as it isn't incompatible with their political ideology. In other words, if you publicly come out against homosexuality while you are sexually harassing your same sex interns, well, that is a problem. If you advocate against industrial pollution and then invest with gross polluters, well that is a problem. What I see that I find sorta sad and funny at the same time is people who will go to the ends of the earth to find scandal on someone they dislike politically, and then feel smug when they dig something up, as if that says to the other side "look, your ideas are bad"... no, it does not make their ideas bad, it makes their leaders flawed. I see several threads going on about a certain idiot politician who will probably never get elected to even dog catcher of Wasilla, and I think, "Why all this energy about this person? She is a nobody. She does not have any sort of credibility"... and it comes down to Cult of Personality trying to disguise itself as real issues and some sort of ideas about something substantial. It just isn't.... There are a couple of politicians I admire. If someone were to show me that they had feet of clay tomorrow it would not change my mind about my ideas. It would not impact my commitment to them. I wonder why all the energy gets invested in protecting images instead of the ideas....
_____________________________
Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt
|