ThatDamnedPanda
Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee quote:
ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda I see the difference, yes, but I'm afraid I don't see the point you're making. If I kill a guy attacking me while I am pregnant, it will be a justifiable homicide. Because the guy was engaging in an illegal activity. If I am pregnant and go get an abortion, that is a legal activity and I would not be allowed to kill the doctor for engaging in a legal activity. So stating that this law allows people to go and murder abortion doctors is incorrect. It is making a slippery slope argument. Oh, Ok. I see your point now. But that's not the way the bill is worded. The relevant language is as follows: quote:
Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person in the lawful defense of such person, or of his or her husband, wife, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant, or the unborn child of any such enumerated person, if there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony, or to do some great personal injury, and imminent danger of such design being accomplished. In other words, if the husband or father of a woman seeking an abortion decides that the doctor is about to inflict "great personal injury" on the fetus, he is justified in killing the doctor. Whether abortion is a legal act or not is not important. The simple act of harming a fetus is sufficient to make it a justifiable homicide.
< Message edited by ThatDamnedPanda -- 2/20/2011 11:47:44 AM >
_____________________________
Panda, panda, burning bright In the forest of the night What immortal hand or eye Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?
|