Tantriqu
Posts: 2026
Joined: 12/29/2006 Status: offline
|
Maybe instant scent vs. the hackneyed male visual once-over? ComPLETEly theoretical and fun conjecture, but what if? The guys I fall for have no scent to me, even after a big run, workout, sexcapades, ANYTHING. A bit of a bummer since I like a whiff of a manly man [of course a bit too much is WAY too much], but apparently it means if they don't register they are genetically foreign, and my DNA is trying to get me knocked up. Men I am definitely not attracted to literally stink to me. Adolescent boys and old men reek like goats because they make butyric acid [like rancid butter], especially my brothers, so perhaps some built-in anti-incest protection. And we all know how evocative the sense of smell is :-) If I type 'your grandmother's lavender perfume' or 'buttered toast' or 'period sex' [thanks, Lady Gaga!], it all elicits deep, pleasant memories based on scent, and in an instant. I've never heard a man not date a presentable woman because of her natural scent, but I've heard plenty of women admit to it on direct questioning, and was a factor of letting go my last prospective pup. So, perhaps women's hindbrains are faster than men's visual cortex? quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer Fr Here's an interesting scientific find,and one that many might find entirely counterintuitive . . . . Apparently, men take five times as long to work out if they're attracted to a particular woman as vice versa. Anyone care to offer an explanation as to why?
|