How instant is attraction? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Prinsexx -> How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 3:53:53 PM)

I don't have a 'type' that I am attracted to. In all honestt I can say that each person I meet is unique. Because of course every person is uniqie.
I've sometimes had this quiet fantasy of holding a party and sending out an invite to veryone in the lifestyle that I have met. Now it wouldn't be so many to be honest as I don't do public play or go to munches. But I would hold the party (in my head at least) to try to ascertain what qualities of a person I find attractive.  If they would all get along or squabble.
I have pictures of course. But what overrides those pictures/qualities is the process of instant attraction.
That I experience as a kind of magnetic draw. And it can happen equally across a room as across an Ocean.
My questions are: have you experinced this process of attraction? If so is it instant? Does attraction need to grow? And does long term experience sustain that attraction or does it fade with time? Do you have a type? And if not what exactly then is the essence of attraction?




littlewonder -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 4:12:48 PM)

for me I'm either instantly attracted to someone within seconds or I'm not. If I'm not attracted to them instantly it's rare that I ever will find them attractive. It's never happened that way for me.

When I met Master I fell for him the second I saw him.




Tantriqu -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 4:13:04 PM)

Before my penultimate pup, I would have said my type was young, smart, mesomorphs. One night I was having a party, and a colleague of a neighbour came in to drop off some work for him but no one was at home, so he came to ask if he could use my phone to call my neighbour. I opened the door to let him in. He bent down to take off his shoes before entering [what a lovely subbie!], stood up, and being very tall kept standing up, looked me in the eyes, and BANG!! I was in love. I 'knew' there was no such thing as love at first sight. I led him to my bedroom so he could use a phone in relative peace.
He was so polite, and admired my photos, and correctly guessed where I took one, to my surprise, and then he left. I had no shame in asking if he was married when my neighbour came over for his work. Divorcing! POUNCE!
So I sent him a copy of the picture he admired, he sent me a dozen roses, we kissed on our first date like I have never been kissed before or since, and several dates later when he were in bed, he said he felt the same way, and had felt embarrassed when he first used my phone since he had a presentiment he would wake up one morning in my bed. And it wasn't just mutual lust: it was love :-)
PURR!
It's long over, but interestingly my 'type' has changed: my hormones pitterpat more for tall and very slim guys, since big muscles just feel like loaves of bread under my hand now. And of course, still love 'em polite, smart and well-read.
And edited to add: and of course, sub!
So yes, usually it's a gradual mutual regard, but OMG that rush of instant, mutual, attraction of brains, bod, gaze and smile! Yes, love at first sight DOES exist :-)




sexyred1 -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 4:17:11 PM)

It has happened both ways for me. I have had instant, lightening bolt attraction and I have also been madly in love with men who during the first 2 dates I felt, ok, whatever and then something happened on the third date and boom!





ThePeripatetic -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 4:17:16 PM)

I wouldn't say that I have a "type". As I think back upon the girls that I've been attracted to, I think the one common theme is intellect. In terms of the physical attributes of these women, they've come in all different shapes, sizes, hair color, eye color, skin color...

But I admit that I usually always pay attention to the physical first. This mentality has led to a couple of very humbling experiences for me. Two of the biggest crushes I've ever developed came with girls that I wasn't initially physically attracted to. Because it took me too long to figure out how sexy these girls were in terms of their character and intellect I ended up firmly placing myself on the "friend train".

Live and learn...




MaamJay -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 4:44:47 PM)

In My case, not instant at all. Always takes time to develop for Me. Hubby 1 I first thought to be a bit of an annoyance as he kept hanging around at the club I was singing at. Hubby 2 I thought was 'OK' on the first date (12 years later I realised that was a generous assessment LOL!). Master ... well I got more attracted to Him over time online and on phone before we met in person. Can't say the first personal meet was that exciting since He had the flu ... and spent the first afternoon conked out in bed! But over that first 5 days I certainly fell for Him! And they are definitely not "a type" - other than tall (I'm tall as well) - Hubby 1 - 4 years older, med build, dark mid-length hair, occasional mustache; Hubby 2 - same age as Me, slim build, light brown short hair, no facial hair; Master - 15 years younger than me, heavy build (with a buddha!), very long wavy brown hair, full beard and mustache. It's very much the inner person I am attracted to and that I find sexy!

Maam Jay aka violet[A]




Darktra151 -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 4:49:47 PM)

I have felt instant attraction one time and it still goes strong today.




NocturnalStalker -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 6:26:22 PM)

My instant attraction is what prevents me from holding meaningful relationships. Oh well, short-term hedonism is what being young is all about. 




golemx -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 8:02:15 PM)

I rarely fall in love if it doesn't happen immediately. It can go the other way quite easily... I may be instantly attracted to someone only to have them completely blow it.

Sometimes it is serendipitous though. An acquaintance I never imagined, and to be honest, I almost prefer those the most.




IrishMist -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 8:04:50 PM)

For me, it's definitly a type that I am attracted to. The darker the personality, the more intense the attraction is. And by dark, I mean violent. I am one of those for whom the phrase 'like attracts like' decribes perfectly.





62704 -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 9:12:45 PM)

"Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell suggests that most people make their minds about most decisions within thirty seconds, whether it's attraction, choice of dinner, whether the house they're touring is the one they want to buy... all sorts of decisions. All the rest of the time is spent consciously recognizing that choice and/or rationalizing the choice. Because of that, I've tried to make myself a lot more conscious about my decisions and reasons. I'm not convinced he's entirely right, but I can definitely see how it works in so many cases - otherwise we wouldn't have impulse items parked at checkout stands.

I definitely have a type based on physical features, and I naturally gravitate towards them when I find them. I wouldn't call it instant love, but certainly instant attraction and focused attention. Infatuation.

The relationships I look back on fondly were with women of all kinds, however. I don't think this instant attraction has much at all to do with suitability for relationship, so much as 'this, this and this together makes me take notice'. Afterwards, that attraction has to grow or else the relationship never really gets off the ground. No matter how attractive someone is there's so much more to a worthwhile relationship or even, dare I say it, love.

The kind of attraction that makes your pants feel too small is infatuation. The kind of attraction that makes your pants feel too small years into the relationship is love. That's my take, anyhow.




golemx -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 9:32:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: 62704
The kind of attraction that makes your pants feel too small is infatuation. The kind of attraction that makes your pants feel too small years into the relationship is love. That's my take, anyhow.

I dunno, just because a woman can cook...




IronBear -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/3/2011 11:55:18 PM)

If its the lightening bolt then I am in boots and all.Otherwise it may be some instant attraction and grows in time.




CherryNeko -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/4/2011 1:44:52 AM)

Hey!
First of all, I'll say I think it’s good not to have one type of person you like, because that way you’re open to people who don’t fit that same type. It’s helpful, though, sometimes, for identifying what you like and want from a partner: it makes it easier if you’re looking for someone with whom you could share *insert duration of relationship and wonderful experiences here*. So I wouldn’t worry about not having a type.
Actually I don’t have a type either. Neurotic as I am, I’d need to be so much more introspective than I am right now for that. I’ll work on it... but I wouldn’t like to leave everything out and I’m constantly changing and analyzing more and more new posibilities. However, there are certain things that irrepairably will always make me sigh. Like Mr. Darcy. Or Queen Victoria.
I think identifying what you like and what you want are good for realizing what you find attractive in others, but it can go from what you’d like to be to what you can’t stand in your life but would love to see in another one’s.
Also, I agree with you when you say instant attraction overrides pictures and qualities, because chemistry between people is not that easy to find. I so know what you mean.
I have noticed that in my case, instant attraction is quickly put under control by sad memories of sadder past experiences... *sobs* It wasn’t nice, I opened up too quickly and it hurt so much that I know now I’ll never ever do it again, so usually when it’s the first time I feel drawn to someone, I don’t fly too high.
My version of instant attraction is in fact when I don’t really know what I’m getting into, and I can’t pull away. It’s usually triggered by someone who can make me nervous and persuade me to do things only by being nice to me. The kind of person that suggests instead of just saying, but convinces you anyway. (Like when you don’t want to be with someone but that someone wants to be with you, and has already decided you’ll like it too, and later you find out that he had this plan... it’s hard to explain.) So, since I kind of panic and block it out at the beginning, it doesn’t go far with me. It’s just the first sight of something physically attractive, or something admirable that I’d like to do someday. I won’t get high on instant attraction. You miss it sometimes, but you can replace it with something deeper, and anyway it’s better for me to stay where I am now. I’m safe here and although I know I may have to move on someday, right now it’s something completely different what’s going on with me, and I need not worry about that right now.
Hmm. The essence of attraction? I feel it’s like the spark that makes you like someone. Of course it needs to grow: a spark, by its own, dies without further encouragement. A campfire will always last longer. Does attraction fade with time? Yes, sometimes. Does a long-term experience sustain it? Yes, sometimes. It depends on the people and on the relationship. Every circumstance counts, but if it goes well, either attraction will be reinforced, or it will be replaced by something stronger. It varies. It can also go wrong, but since if that happens it will be over, it won’t matter that much.
I'm still thinking about it...




StrongSpirit -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/4/2011 6:14:03 AM)

It takes more than a pretty face or body to get me interested.

While I have preferences for physical attraction, I am more interested in mental factors:

1. Smart and creative.
2. Submissive - and smart enough to know that masochist does not always mean submissive.
3. Strong willed - and smart enough to know that a sane dominant man will also have a softer side




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/4/2011 6:20:45 AM)

I've felt an instant attraction once, and that was when I met my ex-husband. I fell madly in love with him the moment I met him. That was 23 years ago, and it hasn't happened since. I've loved others since, but that love grew over time, as I came to know the person. There has to be a strength of character and kindness of spirit in a person now, to attract me.




LillyBoPeep -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/4/2011 9:07:59 AM)

i agree that attraction can happen equally across a room and across an ocean. =p i dated a guy in England for nearly 2 years, and we were only able to manage 2 visits in the entire time.
for me, attraction comes in many forms. there's simple physical attraction -- i have a physical "type" of guys that i like -- i tend to go for bigger, older types who look like they could punch your face off. =p guys who ride motorcycles and stuff like that. haha
and i'm MANIC over long hair on a man -- not sure why, but i love it.

HOWEVER, i realize that those qualities are often superficial, and if the person has nothing going on within his beautiful, rugged, long-haired noggin, then there's no reason for me to stick around.

so there's simple physical attraction, there's mental attraction, there's well... i believe there's "spiritual attraction;" like with my last relationship, i saw a picture of him online and felt, deep down in my gut, that i had known this person before, even though i'd never met him.
all the kinds of attraction can be immediate or they can grow over time. someone who isn't immediately physically attractive can become so after you realize they're mentally attractive. but in my experience, mental attraction doesn't really grow out of just physical attraction.




PeonForHer -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/4/2011 11:44:01 AM)

Fr

Here's an interesting scientific find,and one that many might find entirely counterintuitive . . . .

Apparently, men take five times as long to work out if they're attracted to a particular woman as vice versa.

Anyone care to offer an explanation as to why?




kalikshama -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/4/2011 1:48:10 PM)

After the lightning bolt attraction sucks me in, I find out they are narcissistic and it never ends well for me. Even after I extract myself from the physical relationship, I end up doing favors and getting nothing in return. Oddly, this tends to involve cats or taxes.

The three examples I'm thinking of are all very different body types.




62704 -> RE: How instant is attraction? (2/4/2011 2:26:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
Apparently, men take five times as long to work out if they're attracted to a particular woman as vice versa.

Anyone care to offer an explanation as to why?


Differing biological imperatives and the resulting development of the minds means women having better thin-slicing ability when it comes to assessing a longterm mate. Both find what's suitable, but a woman is looking for suitable over a longer period of time. Men look for what's suitable for right here and now.

I don't mean to imply that men can't think longterm, or that women aren't prone to to impulse. But water goes downhill, and our thinking processes are naturally more adept when working with rather than against biology.




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875