DarkSteven
Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008 Status: offline
|
1. What the hell was he doing there? He just decided to enter a house with no reason for doing so? Not the sort of thing you'd expect from a state Senator. I suspect he was interested in buying the house himself, and decided to check it out illegally. Why he didn't contact the builder and request a viewing, beats me. 2. Note that section 10 of the summons states "That the unsafe condition was created and existed due to the negligence of the Defendants without any negligence on the part of the Plaintiff." From a legal POV, that assertion is necessary because shared negligence will weaken his case considerably. But to make the assertion that his trespassing in no way is negligent, or that he decided to climb a ladder when he obviously didn't know the proper way to do it was negligent, is ridiculous. The guy's career is toast, and rightfully so. The publicity he's getting from this case - one that should be easy to defend against - will kill it. Any decent lawyer will simply request the case be thrown out because of his negligence, which is not properly accounted for.
_____________________________
"You women.... The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs... Quit fretting. We men love you."
|