ThatDamnedPanda
Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven My God. The dome couldn't handle 17 inches of snow in MINNESOTA? Three breaches in the past? And it's inflatable? What kind of idiot decided that it should keep on being used instead of rebuilt correctly, especially with three indications this could happen? I just hope nobody was inside when it failed. This is unforgiveably bad engineering. Welcome to Minnesota, land of upside down logic. Still, though, it's not as bad as it sounds. The roof that collapsed 3 previous times was redesigned, and the roof that collapsed yesterday was not the same as the one that failed 3 times in the 80s. Rebuilding the roof was not an option - they would have had to rebuild the entire stadium. Once they decided to build a stadium on the cheap, and committed to the inflatable roof, they were stuck with it. There was never any way for them to depart from that basic design concept. You're right, it was bad engineering, but it was also experimental at the time it was designed. When it was first constructed, they were still learning how to build inflatable domes. It was only the 2nd major stadium with an inflatable roof, the first being the Pontiac Silverdome, built 7 years earlier. The Silverdome had worked out well, so they felt they had good reason to trust the basic design. Having it collapse 3 times in the first year and a half came as a rude shock, of course, but they identified the design flaws, and corrected them. The fixes they made in 1983 were successful, and they didn't have any more problems with snow until yesterday. We had 28 inches of wet, heavy snow in '91, and the redesign held up fine, so they had every reason to believe the structure was safe. There are a lot of things to hate about that hideous monstrosity of a "stadium," but I think they had good reason to believe it was a safe venue.
_____________________________
Panda, panda, burning bright In the forest of the night What immortal hand or eye Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?
|