Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/21/2010 9:51:16 AM   
leadership527


Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KNelson
Perhaps I am confusing TPE with M/s? Or you could call the D/s relationship on with depth that is trending toward M/s. Though I tend to agree with your conclusion that a spousal commitment and a TPE, M/s commitment don't co-exist well - if at all.
I'm on this line of reasoning too. Had you said "D/s" rather than "M/s" or TPE I'd have gone with the "everything is the spouses concern" line of reasoning. However, I see no way that I can have a TOTAL claim on someone who is actually married and LEGALLY bound to someone else. Let's remember that marriage law is property law if you go back just a tiny bit in time.


_____________________________

~Jeff

I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me
I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael

(in reply to KNelson)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/21/2010 4:57:05 PM   
Iholdthestrings


Posts: 172
Joined: 9/23/2010
From: Fort Wayne, IN
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

However, I see no way that I can have a TOTAL claim on someone who is actually married and LEGALLY bound to someone else. Let's remember that marriage law is property law if you go back just a tiny bit in time.



It is for this very reason that, while the poppet needs to feel My ownership of her, it at times feels more like joint custody from My point of view.

_____________________________

She tied you to Her kitchen chair... and from your lips She drew the Hallelujah.
---------------------------
If I had an orgasm-trigger phrase, it would be "No Strings Housework". ;)

(in reply to leadership527)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/21/2010 9:26:47 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3919
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
  If you're romantically involved with someone who is in a TPE situation, then you're an idiot.

(in reply to Iholdthestrings)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/22/2010 2:49:49 AM   
CallaFirestormBW


Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

If you're romantically involved with someone who is in a TPE situation, then you're an idiot.



You're being serious here? Have you ever BEEN in one of these relationships to be able to judge such?

(yes, I know... snarky.. I apologize to the innocent bystanders).

Calla

< Message edited by CallaFirestormBW -- 11/22/2010 2:50:33 AM >


_____________________________

***
Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!"

"Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/22/2010 3:24:31 AM   
KNelson


Posts: 26
Joined: 7/13/2009
Status: offline
I do have some sympathy for Awareness' comment. While I've not been in an M/s or D/s relationship, my SO has. And the communication between me and the top was almost non-existent. Many discussions where I bit back comments about effects the M was having on the s and many discussions about the need for greater communication. And I was kind of an idiot. My SO split from the M, but I am still sorting out somethings -- so my original post was a kind of gut check to see what other people think.

(in reply to CallaFirestormBW)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/22/2010 6:53:02 AM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14449
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KNelson

The question - When a submissive has a spouse and the spouse is not the master or mistress, how much of the TPE is the spouse's concern?
I don't believe that you can do TPE when the submissive is married to someone else.

Total Power Exchange would translate to the D having control of issues that pertain to the spouse and family of the submissive.

_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to KNelson)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/23/2010 2:21:09 AM   
CallaFirestormBW


Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

And the communication between me and the top was almost non-existent.


While I appreciate your situation, KNelson, the reality is that the issue was -not- the dynamic... it was the lack of communication between the -members- of that dynamic. No dynamic will be successful if the individuals involved do not communicate with one another -- particularly about how that dynamic is functioning.

Perhaps it is because I am a poly person, but I have always recognized that, dynamics aside, multiple-partner relationships take a great deal of such communication. TPE simply means that, in our case, I hold the authority -- I have, on several occasions, been the one making sure that a servant of mine took care of hir existing obligations to those xhe'd already made promises to -- and I saw that as part of my job. I consider it part of my job even for those that I -don't- hold that measure of authority over, if they're a part of my household... because the health and well being of my household DEPENDS on the health and well-being of all of its parts.

While I can certainly respect that there was an issue with your situation, that does not automatically imply that -every- similar style of situation is "bad"... NOR does it even -remotely- imply that the people who get involved in such things are... how did Awareness put it?...Oh, yes... idiots.

Calla


_____________________________

***
Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!"

"Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer

(in reply to KNelson)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/23/2010 2:29:26 AM   
CallaFirestormBW


Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Total Power Exchange would translate to the D having control of issues that pertain to the spouse and family of the submissive.


Yes, it would. Among other things, if communication is good between the dominant member and the non-participating spouse, it may very well include reinforcing the promises made by the submissive member to that non-participating spouse and/or to any offspring that they may have (to which promises have been made by virtue of the decision to -have- those children).

Also, -holding- authority is not the same thing as 'controlling'. Delegation is a tool by which certain areas of management may be extended to another individual. In this case, it is NOT in the dominant party's or the relationship's best interests to retain micromanagement-level control over the operations of the yielding individual's household UNLESS the dominant party is a part of that household as well... and that is where delegation becomes an amazingly useful tool.

Calla


_____________________________

***
Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!"

"Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/23/2010 3:40:39 AM   
Elisabella


Posts: 3939
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl
I don't believe that you can do TPE when the submissive is married to someone else.

Total Power Exchange would translate to the D having control of issues that pertain to the spouse and family of the submissive.


I think it's definitely possible, but terribly unfair to the spouse.

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/23/2010 5:10:59 AM   
CaringandReal


Posts: 1397
Joined: 2/15/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

While I can certainly respect that there was an issue with your situation, that does not automatically imply that -every- similar style of situation is "bad"... NOR does it even -remotely- imply that the people who get involved in such things are... how did Awareness put it?...Oh, yes... idiots.



It's hard for me to think of a larger (as in prevelant among the population) mental error than the tendency, when it comes to our personal lives, to generalize too much from specific cases. Circumstances, such as personalities, unspoken factors, spoken factors that express themselves in a different way depending upon their combination with thousands of other factors, and all of the complex and often unpredictable combinations that arise from their interaction always alter such cases. When you factor in the sad reality that people use even the words we do have to mean things vastly different than their original sense, then if the outcomes you experienced are exactly like the the outcomes I experienced, I view this as a bit more than a small miracle.

I guess generalizing from specifics is necessary when one's only means of communication is the highly impoverished/compressed method provided by speech, but so often it strikes me, when I see it in myself or others, as magical thinking or wish-fullfilment. We have a suspect motive: we want other people to be like us or, if they are not, to at least be understandable or capable of understanding us. That seems a given of human social nature and it does a fine job of greasing what might otherwise be tense interactions, so we gloss over (or do not ask about) the areas that point out differences. But sometimes this "useful for getting along with others who are essentially mysteries" trait, screws us over, royally, and results in dysfunctional social interactions rife with stupidity and intolerance. The grossest examples of this type of incorrect generalization are of the form you (rightly) critiqued above: "If it happened to me in this way then it MUST happen in this exact same way to everybody else...and if someone insists they didn't experience it in this way, well they are clearly untrustworthy lying scum trying to undermine my far better reality!" (a.k.a. the assertion of other types of expereinces threaten the fuck out of me, because I'm at core, deeply insecure) This assumption, in addition to being one of the clear indicators of deep or unconscious insecurity, is a terribly egotistical one, it indicates a highly imbalanced and extremely dangerous (to one's self, mostly) hubris, akin to that of Icarus's.

That's not to say there aren't patterns out there or ways of behaving that aren't common among people. If there weren't, we probably couldn't communicate at all. But these patterns, I think, are the tip of an iceberg, there's a universe of complexity behind them, in the details, that make one person's apparently cut-and-dried circumstance vastly different than another person's. I think at best when any of us offer advise to a stranger asking a question on a message board, we're guessing. We're making the best guess we can based on our individual experiences, but our experiences may not be their experiences. That's why a lot of different points of view are good to get in response to a question. While five people may respond with "don't touch that! I did and was burned," two may respond with "I touched it and nothing bad happened to me" and one may say, "Touch away! it's a blast!" But if the person given the conflicting answers doesn't follow up (and sadly, almost nobody does this on message boards--they're simply looking for the answer that confirms their own beliefs about the situation) by exploring what makes the first five experiences different than that of the other three and which, if any, matches their own personal situation, then nothing useful is learned.



_____________________________

"A friend who bleeds is better" --placebo

"How seldom we recognize the sound when the bolt of our fate slides home." --thomas harris

(in reply to CallaFirestormBW)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/23/2010 5:34:31 AM   
KNelson


Posts: 26
Joined: 7/13/2009
Status: offline
I do actually agree with your assessment Calla -- that the issue, the major issue was the lack of communication.

That is where I was an idiot in thinking that the situation could eventually iron out -- it could not, not with the dominant or my SO for that matter so utterly unwilling to have a three-way communication chain. At the end of the day, I think a D/s relationship can work if you have the right combination of people who have a commitment to making things work as best they all can. That said, I also think if the D/s trends to M/s with TPE, then it can rapidly become unfair to the SO who is not in the dynamic.


(in reply to CaringandReal)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/23/2010 7:22:40 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KNelson
That said, I also think if the D/s trends to M/s with TPE, then it can rapidly become unfair to the SO who is not in the dynamic.

Which depends on how you are using the term "unfair".

I will say straight off the bat that any person granting their SO permission to have multiple relationships (poly) should have the same right for themselves.  In My opinion, it is completely unfair for a couple to come to the conclusion that one partner has the right to have multiple relationships and the other person must remain monogamous.  Whether the other person chooses to utilize that right or not is their own decision.

With that said, I think it's important for someone who is allowing their partner to engage in an authority dynamic with someone else to understand that they are making certain concessions.  By saying that your partner can be involved in a dynamic with someone else, you are giving up some of the time with that person that you would have had if you were being monogamous.  Sharing time is just plain a part of poly.

Also, you have to accept that your partner has an authority figure in their life.  You can't retain power that you have agreed to give to someone else.  Nobody is going to be happy that way because there is going to be constant struggle. 

Truthfully, if I was working with a spouse that wanted to meddle in every decision made in the dynamic or wanted to retain decision power, I probably wouldn't be involved.  Things like the protocols of the dynamic or how My household is run are some examples of My jurisdiction.  I feel the same way if I've been contact to fix whatever.  If I've been asked to resolve issue X, I'm going to do that My way.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to KNelson)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs - 11/23/2010 7:35:45 AM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
quote:

akin to that of Icarus's.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5u5LZ-DN3iA


_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to CaringandReal)
Profile   Post #: 33
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Mind your own business - TPE and OSOs Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.203