Focus50
Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004 From: Newcastle, Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mistoferin On the other side of the site a random profile popped up with this statement. "Control must be given, if it is taken it is not true control." It sparked some thoughts in my coffee deficient brain. If the statement is true, what is control if taken? Is it coercion? Oppression? Domination? If control is given, is it indeed true control? or just the illusion of control? especially if you believe that what is given can just as easily be taken back... A few years back, these Boards had a small band wagon touting "authority transfer" in place of Power Exchange. The big flaw (IMO) was that it amounts to the Dominant being a power/control eunuch until empowered by the submissive and panders to the nonsense that the submissive therefore has all the power and control in a D/s relationship; of even deciding if there will be a relationship.... pffft This "Control must be given" is of the same fluff. In a healthy D/s relationship, it's consent that must be given (AND desired by the other) and the control factor takes care of itself. IE, any D/s relationship depends and is defined by an *unequal* control dynamic. Of course the submissive gets to withdraw consent (control) any time they desire. But as far as this Dom is concerned, she only gets to play that relationship ending card *once*. Focus.
_____________________________
Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown> Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)
|