nevergrowdup
Posts: 86
Joined: 12/1/2007 Status: offline
|
And just when I thought I heard it all ... Feederism? Really? From the Urban Dictionary (not the most reliable source ... but in this case, consistent with a video that I just saw about it), this definition: An underground sexual fetish which involves one partner (the feeder) feeding the other, both to obtain sexual arousal and to encourage weight gain in the feedee. Feederism can vary in nature, from a consensual act between two people who mutually appreciate a larger body type, to non-consensual abuse, which may involve force-feeding and bondage and is undertaken with the intention of fattening up the feedee to the point of immobility and total dependence. The weight gained can also vary froma few pounds to hundreds, whilst some feeder relationships are not undertaken with the purpose of weight gain at all but for the enjoyment of food in an intimate context. Most feedees are female (BBW or SSBBW) whilst the feeders tend to be FA males, although this is not the case, and gay/lesbian feeder relationships are not entirely unheard of. Although this definition doesn't explicitly link Feederism to BDSM, I understand the the feeder is a dominant and the feedee submissive. I'm pretty open-minded when it comes to tolerance of fetishes, but if the purpose of this is really to make the other immobile and dependent, I have some concerns about this one as it can have very serious health consequences. But then again, is it any worse than some of the other more risky fetishes? Can't figure out why this one rubs me the wrong way. Am I alone?
|