Is marriage (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


osf -> Is marriage (6/28/2010 2:36:29 PM)

Is marriage conducive to the M/s O/p dynamic?




Nineveh -> RE: Is marriage (6/28/2010 2:54:38 PM)

I found it to be very destructive to it in my case.  However I do not think that is universal.  My wife needs to worship her D type in ways that are not compatible with day to day interaction and life.




Missokyst -> RE: Is marriage (6/28/2010 2:55:27 PM)

I don't know about anyone else but when I was married I was a slave, title or not. That is the number 1 reason I will never marry again.




childoftheshadow -> RE: Is marriage (6/28/2010 2:58:18 PM)

It's worked just fine for us for the last 9 years




DarlingSavage -> RE: Is marriage (6/28/2010 2:59:35 PM)

Well aren't you special!




AQuietSimpleMan -> RE: Is marriage (6/28/2010 3:35:01 PM)

I will honestly say that I do not believe it is.

I am married to my slave.

She has also had my child.

What this means?

I am not always able to be consistant in my treatment of her because at times when integrity tells me she isn't being the slave you collared, the other part of me says, Right, she's being the woman you married, and the Mother your child needs.

It can be worked on, but I can tell you flat out it can at times be very painful.

Personally I would say that it's a lot easier to have control over another when there isn't the emotional connection that comes from Love, Marriage, and Parenting.

But I should also say that the alternative is not something I would choose to do today.

QSM




littlewonder -> RE: Is marriage (6/28/2010 3:38:58 PM)

For me it's even moreso.

Traditional marriage to me more closely resembles M/s more than anything else.





Mercnbeth -> RE: Is marriage (6/28/2010 3:41:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf
Is marriage conducive to the M/s O/p dynamic?


No - however, our M/s dynamic has been conducive to our happy, fulfilling, FUN!, marriage.




AQuietSimpleMan -> RE: Is marriage (6/28/2010 3:44:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf
Is marriage conducive to the M/s O/p dynamic?


No - however, our M/s dynamic has been conducive to our happy, fulfilling, FUN!, marriage.



Merc,

I agree with this statement. But then again you and beth are different in some respects, you know this and yet deny it, I would love to have your life... on the good days, not when things get left in cabs.

QSM




sublizzie -> RE: Is marriage (6/28/2010 7:40:16 PM)

It depends on the participants and how they work through their dynamic. Some seem to manage it well, some not so much. I know people in M/s relationships who've been married for years. I know others who are in M/s relationships and are not legally married but have been together for years so it feels like they're married. I think any relationship can work if both parties are willing to work at making it work.




CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Is marriage (6/28/2010 8:02:03 PM)

Absolutely. Some of my best friends who participate in authority-based dynamics are married. Just like any other relationship, as long as everyone is compatible on the subjects at hand, it can work out great...

OTOH, springing "Gee, honey, you know, I've always had this hankering to have a man/woman kneel at my feet and obey my every command, so from now on you're my slave until the end of time!" on an unsuspecting mate... well... not so much. Usually, you have to ease into it a bit more slowly with someone that one is already in an established relationship with, if the relationship doesn't include authority structures... it -can- work, but it's a lot less certain if there's never been any discussion about this in the relationship up until that point.

Calla




shadownet51 -> RE: Is marriage (6/28/2010 8:08:35 PM)

Hmmm... This topic interests me as well...
I am currently owned by my significant other, and i do plan to marry this girl. I guess for me, marrage comes first and the lifestyle second (not to offend anyone here though).
This is really interesting to see how other people's experiences have turned out and have seriously gotten me thinking about stuff.
Thanks everyone




ranja -> RE: Is marriage (6/29/2010 1:53:56 AM)

i don't know... we were married first and it was good... and then it sucked.... and then we put some BDSM into it... and things got a lot better, so we put some more in and we're very back on track now.




MsMillgrove -> RE: Is marriage (6/29/2010 2:16:51 AM)

I find that the two dynamics-marriage and d/s work best for marriages later in life when the children are out of the house, or for marriages with no children at all.

When children arrive, it appears that the d/s has to go into the bedroom or be an "outside" evening at a club. D/s is not something that you want to put away.. to put into a drawer, take in and out.

Yet, in front of children, you model a behavior. If you're lucky to be in a culture where it's a tradition to have one partner in charge of the household, to be the authority, this is easier. In homes with Mid-Eastern or some Latin or Asian roots, the women can acceptably behave in a submissive fashion. In a Jewish household, the woman is queen at home. A male Jewish sub is therefore in a great spot. So it's possible if the cultural-ethnic roots are already present for the couple, they could have an easier time of keeping their d/s out in the open in front of the children.

Every couple has to find their own way to adjust and adapt. Personally, I find it hard to be my sadistic self or to discipline a person I am deeply in love with in a romantic sense.
That's just me, I would never marry a slave.




cassandria -> RE: Is marriage (6/29/2010 9:26:59 AM)

I feel that stability and security are conducive to a Master/slave dynamic. They are for me, anyways.

Marriage can certainly be part of that, as we still live in a society that recognizes marriage as a solid institution.

There's a huge difference between introducing someone as your gf, than your wife, in many circles.

When I lived in the Middle East, I was married...and it was definitely a Master/slave dynamic. It never interfered, in fact, I think it enhanced.




Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Is marriage (6/29/2010 9:49:14 AM)

It CAN BE, however the real question is how condusive two people are to one another to begin with?




DesFIP -> RE: Is marriage (6/29/2010 11:44:13 AM)

Actually I disagree on Ms Millgrove's comments on Jewish marriages. The women have the greater responsibility on the home front. We do not however get to sit around on our thrones eating grapes someone else is peeling for us. But I find most people I know divide responsibilities on traditional lines. Women do the housework, cooking, overseeing homework in lower grades. Come high school we pass along helping them pass science to the men. Men take out the garbage, change the oil in the cars, cut the grass.




CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Is marriage (6/29/2010 2:08:55 PM)

quote:

When children arrive, it appears that the d/s has to go into the bedroom or be an "outside" evening at a club. D/s is not something that you want to put away.. to put into a drawer, take in and out.


I have to say that this hasn't been my experience, having raised a number of children within an active authority-based household, and also being somewhat atypically qualified by having been on both the authority-yielding and the authority-wielding ends of the authority-structure in that household while raising said saplings.

The authority structures of our household don't go "into the closet" for the 'saplings', and never have. At the same time, our saplings have learned valuable lessons about how servants are properly managed, and about caring for those who serve. They have also learned about shared responsibility for the well-being of a household, and about not taking advantage of those who yield authority (and not being -taken- advantage of, if you're the one doing the yielding).

Always, there is the understanding among our saplings in the house that
1. The adults are the ones to make and/or enforce the rules, and that this is regardless of whether those adults tend to yield authority or wield authority;

2. Certain of the adults have the final word in what happens or does not happen in our household, and if there are any questions, those adults who yield authority will obtain clarification and a final decision from those who wield authority -- however, in NO case will a sapling be allowed to defy or badger ANY adult to try to get around a rule or restriction or to try to manipulate an adult into giving them permission -- the authority-wielders in the household have the final word.

(one thing I'd like to add to this is that when I was in training, and was yielding authority, every single one of our Keepers came to me when a decision was to be made about one of the saplings I gave birth to, to find out what my thoughts were about the situation, and that was considered when the decision was laid down. In this sense, its easier, in a way, when it's a married couple, as they already share parenting responsibilities, and usually, one parent or the other will already -be- the "final word" parent);

3. "Saplings" will treat all members of the household with respect for their years of life experience, and will abide by the house rules regarding chores (our household has requirements for contributing to the overall welfare of the household); entertainment/guests; and who may or may not give permission for activities, etc. Discipline may be meted out by any adult(s) in the household agreed on by the most responsible party for that child (understanding that we often have saplings who are genetically related to only one adult in our household, but that all of the adults share some measure of parenting for all of our saplings).

I will agree that the blatantly sexual or easily misunderstood aspects of running an authority-based relationship certainly go into hiding in front of the saplings. This may include some "disciplinary tools" that would not be used in front of saplings, but that's less of an issue for us, because those disciplinary methods aren't really used with anyone in our household -saplings included. As an example, we wouldn't do a flogging, whether disciplinary or sensual, in front of the saplings... but neither would we do so in front of, say, a sensitive non-participating ADULT member of our household. Since flogging is a luxury pastime for us, and is, typically, more recreational than disciplinary anyway (since it has been our experience that "punishment" is a really ineffective way of managing people), it's a no-brainer that that goes in the "not around the saplings" pile.

OTOH, we have found that there is -absolutely nothing- wrong with having a defined hierarchy/authority-based structure in our household, and, in fact, it has given us the opportunity to raise amazing saplings who are, in general, strong, resilient, and socially adept people.

I think that the thing that throws so many people off is that the authority-based relationships that they are either involved in or seeking are, at least in part, based on sexual or "dating/mating" foundations. That is not always the case, and in a marriage, it is both possible and practical to retain an authority dynamic that does not intrude on the smooth flow of the household, nor would it draw inappropriate attention from either saplings or protective-authority individuals. Unless one is prancing around the house in a vinyl French-maid's outfit or smacking the servants with a riding crop or the like, there is nothing inherently comprised within an authority-based dynamic that would prevent its full functionality even with saplings in the household.

Calla




MarcEsadrian -> RE: Is marriage (6/29/2010 2:36:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf
Is marriage conducive to the M/s O/p dynamic?

According to the Devil's Dictionary it is.

Marriage means many things to different people and different cultures. For some, it's the extension of a patriarchal tradition couched in patriarchal religion. For others, it's a woman's legal method for dividing up a man's property and earnings in her favor—or vice versa. With that in mind, I guess how marriage is conducive to O/p depends upon its structure, which is made of civil, religious and optionally contractual (premarital agreement) elements. Lastly, it's the attitudes and expectations of both parties therein. This is all a long-winded way of saying "it depends".

I personally don't know why anyone needs to get married these days, but if it's what you both want, why not? Be sure to be sure and read the fine print. Of course, you both already did that soberly as the slave and Master in the relationship, correct? The 50/50 divorce rate coupled with all the intimidating legal mechanisms inherent in alimony and child custody shouldn't make you bat an eyelash in light of that arguably graver arrangement you've made, but if it does, I might suggest you still have some work to do on basic "shop theory".




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Is marriage (6/29/2010 2:40:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Missokyst

I don't know about anyone else but when I was married I was a slave, title or not. That is the number 1 reason I will never marry again.

^THIS^ definitely, most absolutely ^THIS^




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125