einstien5201
Posts: 63
Joined: 9/29/2009 Status: offline
|
Because, Termyn8or, regardless of the competency of the decision-maker, the most likely result of a decision based on incorrect data is a worse decision than that based on correct data. The right data, filtered through an idiot, can yield a bad answer. The wrong data, filtered through *anything*, will always yield a bad answer. Unless you believe that the government is *actively* trying to screw you, providing correct data is always better choice than incorrect data. I won't argue with the idea that some things are none of their damn business, but I'm leery even of this stance. Considering that the primary use of census data is to allocate seats in the house of representatives, I'm going to make damn sure I get counted. My state having more seats means that my vote counts more (assuming the actual number of voters remains constant). Since I believe I'm a better decision-maker than most of the population, I want my vote as heavily weighted as possible.
< Message edited by einstien5201 -- 10/30/2009 10:40:28 PM >
|