|
MarcEsadrian -> RE: Sub/Dom? (9/30/2009 8:53:14 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ShaunG Let me rephrase the thesis... Does anyone else like Doming the Dominatrix? No. And that answer extends to those women who do not necessarily identify with being "dominas", but are willful, arrogant and subversive, nonetheless. As for actualized dominant females, I generally prefer them to be as they are; in purity they are more beautiful (to me). Of course, a girl who is entirely surrendered and actualized in her submission has an equal appeal (to me). I just don't like mixing the two, or confusing the two. For some people, it's the buzz they get out of conquering something that is a willful challenge, and that can be a mental or physical exercise (or both). I really couldn't be bothered with the Papier-mâché hubris, psychodrama or the skeins of head games that are sure to be involved if dominating the dominant female is really what you're after. I'm not sure, however; the thesis is still somewhat vague, especially when you use a word like "doming", which makes me think of Saint Andrews crosses and heart-shaped paddles, replete with "pull my hair and give it to me, daddy!" Now don't get me wrong; I don't think there is anything necessarily wrong with that sort of hobby / therapy—I just have a tendency to think that is not dominance, though it may be "doming".
|
|
|
|