DavanKael
Posts: 3072
Joined: 10/6/2007 Status: offline
|
I can't cite any references off of the top of my head. As someone who is both professionally and personally interested in human sexuality, I have done some specialized coursework in the area. The nature/nurture debate goes on about all sorts of things, so I suppose why not bdsm. First, I would say that trying to lump everything bdsm into one category is worse than what's currently the case in the DSM with the, I believe, 7 different types of schizophrenia (It's so divergent and considering it all under the same umbrella doesn't make a lot of sense to me). So, just a sampling of some thoughts informed by years of accumulating knowledge and forming my own opinions. I'm not saying I am right, I'm telling you what I think. Imo, fetishes, true fetishes (Not the popularized bullshit use of the term) stem from something after birth: I don't think someone is born with a fetish. The most immediate theory I give you is that it's counter-survival. Now, one might retort with so is homosexuality because same-sex unions don't breed. Well, the difference, though, imo, is the pervasiveness and the compulsion behind fetishes; how they can absorb a focus to the exclusion of much else. What DesFip said about the bird study is something I have seen argued about humans in literature: that folks who are gay are actually helpful to shoring up the offspring of others through their contributions to society that lessens the burden from someone else (Or via caring for offspring if the parents can't, in some instances). The problem with figuring out how far back we can trace fetishes is that written language is a relatively new concept, in th grand scheme of universal time. Straight up causing of/endurance of pain? I believe that's in our genes. There are all sorts of physiological reasons why this makes sense and the first thing that pops into my mind is neurotransmitters. Endorphin highs feel cool! Some exercise to get the rush, others take a flogging. < shrug > Add to this pain as a venerated part of human experience across time, society feeds it whether they wish to admit it or not. Dominants, submissives, and those who walk between. Much like male, female, and third sex (Or however one wishes to define it) seem to be variances within the species that experiences tweak. It occurs to me that this is a topic that could be discussed for hours. Humanity doesn't sexually exist at a single point, there's a span of behaviors. As with any other behaviors, I believe that there are inherences in our genes that can be tweaked by experiences in most instances. There are few things in terms of the grand umbrella of bdsm that I believe are created just experientially (Fetishes, as an example). My opinion only and as I enjoy coming up with research concepts but abhorr the rigors of scientific method, I don't see myself doing the research to flesh these things out. Interesting topic, though, and I look forward to reading additional replies. :> Davan
< Message edited by DavanKael -- 9/12/2009 12:05:07 PM >
_____________________________
May you live as long as you wish & love as long as you live -Robert A Heinlein It's about the person & the bond,not the bondage -Me Waiting is 170NZ (Aka:Sex God Du Jour) pts Jesus,I've ALWAYS been a deviant -Leadership527,Jeff
|