Joseff
Posts: 505
Joined: 6/2/2007 Status: offline
|
I have always considered the defining difference between slavery and submission to be the concept of ownership. If you can consider yourself property, or if you can concieve that you could actually be someone's property, then you have the proper mindset, or personality, to be a slave. The converse would be true for the master. Someone long ago, it may have been St. Patrick, said, "No man is a slave who would be free." The Idea being that , although one can be captured, held, and forced to work, as long as they yearned for freedom, they were not truly a slave. There is some mechanism in the human psyche, probably for defense, that allows us to fall into a slave mindset. What that may have to do with WIITWD is this: That mechanism for some, is easier to access, and even attractive. Those people find comfort in being under controll of a Master. Of course, in our modern society, no one can legally own another person. Here is where the the final aspect comes in, consent. Even the person who thrives in an environment of slavery, knows on some level that they can always walk away, but they would never consider such a thing unless some circumstance forced that knowledge onto their conscience.
_____________________________
This is gonna hurt... Joseff
|