RE: curious RFID

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: curious RFID

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: curious RFID

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: curious RFID - 4/27/2009 9:45:49 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

This is what you want,
this is what you get,
this is what you want,
this is what you get,

I might just have to order that, as long as they don't require Paypal. Seems like it is easier to order ICBMs than to get a Paypal account sometomes.

At any rate, reference the "Hypothetical" thread for my opinion about new technology. I am sure, after studying nuclear fusion technology that I could build a plasma cannon. I also know how to turn the magnetron in a normal microwave oven into a weapon. (that's why they tried to make everybody register them) I have many more ideas that I simply refuse to share because the people, the human race, is simply not to be trusted with such advances.

There are already technologies in use which many people are unaware. What they can do now is already scary, and they avoid using it because people would become aware of it's existence. With the use of supertweeters and ultrasonics, they can control a crowd, by varying the waveform they can make everyone feel like they have to take a piss RIGHT NOW, or make them disoriented to the point they do not know their own name. They can spot one pot plant in a fifty acre cornfield from over 22,000 miles away. I know because I know how the technology works. They don't have to zoom in and look at the leaves, they just look for the unique spectral signature.

So fellow revolutionaries, or people who are starting to think it is high time, be aware of what we are up against. I will not support any uprising unless and until we have some chance of success. At this point in time, even if we had 80% of the the population rebelling, we would have probably a 10% chance of success. That is a sucker bet if I ever saw one. And remember Sherman in Savannah, they are not very forgiving.

T

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: curious RFID - 4/28/2009 3:09:01 AM

MsFlutter

Posts: 1305
Joined: 11/12/2008
From: East Coast
Status: offline

Can't say I know too many people that have the ability to weaponize cookware, Termy. I'd be very surprised if you aren't already working for DARPA.

I want a small LRAD but the manufacturers won't indulge me. Next on my wish list is that Mosquito technology. Torturing noisy people appeals to me. Any time you're ready to field a small LRAD that can be mounted in my eaves and pointed at teenagers who have no idea how to act in public, please let me know.

p.s. I also want a dampener that will surpress boom cars. Once they've maxed out the volume trying to compensate, I'll switch the unit off. <KABOOM> BWAHAHAHAHA !

< Message edited by MsFlutter -- 4/28/2009 3:16:44 AM >

_____________________________

'Dont torture yourself, Gomez darling. That's my job' Morticia Addams

"The right data, filtered through an idiot, can yield a bad answer." einstien5201

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: curious RFID - 4/28/2009 5:15:43 AM

MrRodgers

Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsFlutter

Can't say I know too many people that have the ability to weaponize cookware, Termy. I'd be very surprised if you aren't already working for DARPA.

I want a small LRAD but the manufacturers won't indulge me. Next on my wish list is that Mosquito technology. Torturing noisy people appeals to me. Any time you're ready to field a small LRAD that can be mounted in my eaves and pointed at teenagers who have no idea how to act in public, please let me know.

p.s. I also want a dampener that will surpress boom cars. Once they've maxed out the volume trying to compensate, I'll switch the unit off. <KABOOM> BWAHAHAHAHA !

Study the field and you could work as a specialist to equip the RFID chips with a noise output detector and immediately stop their heart upon reaching a certain DB level.

(in reply to MsFlutter)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: curious RFID - 4/28/2009 6:42:08 AM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

Hmmm, not a bad plan but I would throw in an earache or headache subroutine. Otherwise someone else will have to shut that shit off.

T

(in reply to MrRodgers)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: curious RFID - 4/28/2009 9:14:14 AM

MsFlutter

Posts: 1305
Joined: 11/12/2008
From: East Coast
Status: offline

Oooooo - I *like* the way you two think !!

_____________________________

'Dont torture yourself, Gomez darling. That's my job' Morticia Addams

"The right data, filtered through an idiot, can yield a bad answer." einstien5201

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: curious RFID - 4/28/2009 1:01:41 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

MsF, you ain't seen nuthin yet !

T

(in reply to MsFlutter)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: curious RFID - 4/29/2009 9:49:42 AM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

So- the go to pee machine- maybe they can reverse it so people dont have to pee right away.

I do believe that the govt is doing tests that we wont know about for a long time.

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 27

RE: curious RFID - 4/29/2009 3:14:28 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

You don't know the half of it Hunky. They had things in the 1960s that are still not common knowledge.

My Uncle left the USAF in the 1960s and he eventually told me about something. A self powered IC. Now they hadn't even really developed non volitile memory at the time, but this thing powered itself. No off switch. It almost scared me, but I knew disconnectiong it should effectively neutralize it.

He was an electronics tech in there, and got to play with all the cool new toys. I suspect that when they took the garbage out ten years later, the studios would be there to take the old stuff and put it in shows like Star Trek etc. He gave me this set of small books when I was very young, an electronics primer. I learned so much within a week that if it happened today my head would explode. Never seen anything like it before or since, it was like - you MUST understand this. They were right and I did, at a very early age. I remember to this day one thing - there are only three active electronic circuits that exist. This also holds true to this day.

They had alot more than they let on, ray guns back in the 1960s. Practical ? Not quite, but they worked and the technology was proven. In other words you could have a ray gun, say about an eight watt handheld CO2 laser that would cut through a car in about five minutes, but you had to drag a truckload of batteries to run it. Technologies that would blow your mind, but many of them had problems in the implementation. And think this, they have had spectography for a very long time, it used to be done with prisms. Now it is reduced to mainly finding pot plants in corn fields.

Yes my friends, at one time the US was really on top of the world when it came to technology, but I wouldn't bet on it anymore. Not that we are slag mind you, but I just don't we are at the epitome anymore. Actually the Russians have been better at radio wave propogation for many decades. Some of the most advanced listening devices were not invented here. And no I will not say where, who cares ? Fuck that can of worms.

You see it's like a good fight. You find ways. Thinkers can think up things that could blow your mind, but much simpler, how about a pair of horns with sound so loud that it hurts your ears ? Keep it simple. How can you attack someone or handle a weapon with your hands covering your ears ? There is much more to this. All it takes is thought, and apparently they can think, contrary to popular belief. Bright lights come in handy, they facilitate sight for some, but can pretty much blind others at least temporarily. And yes, as someone deemed worthy of mention, there are many potential weapons in your own kitchen, deadly if you want them to be.

T

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 28

RE: curious RFID - 4/29/2009 3:54:38 PM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

I finally caught that rotten cat! Man it is fast. She would rather starve then be in the room I want her in.

Some research is moved to China. When we went conservative on stem cell research- scientists find China less restrictive. IMO the US does the restricted research anyway....

If one follows the Illuminati thing- Russia was promised higher status then the US. Something like the 5th house what ever that is.

We might start putting pressure in Russia- the loans they took in 1997 are now paid off...and of course the goal is for people and counties to be deep in debt.

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 29

RE: curious RFID - 4/30/2009 9:54:28 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

I could've caught that cat electronically Hunky. A quick discharge of about 300KV, positive ground would've merely stunned him. Shouldn't even stop his heart, but if so a vigorous belly massage should get it going again, that is if you choose to.

We are talking about a single discharge from a cap of a value around 0.022uF, that should not kill. Then you can get your revenge.

Y'know I actually built an electric chair in my bedroom when I was young. This might not be quite the time and place for the details though. Suffice it to say, evil geniuses and mad scientists can be dangerous.

There are still only three active electronic circuits in use, it is all in how they are put together. Very, very few know just how far that has gone. In fact quite a few of the things people think only exist in the movies actuallly do exist in real life. In most cases though they are simply too expensive.

For example, those handheld laser pointers. If they would take the beam size down to 1/100th of it's present size, it is effectively 100 times the power, just because it is concentrated into a smaller area. This could just about cut steel. And it might do it on one AA battery. Think of it.

The future is here, for the few. OK the teensy laser might only be able to a very small amount of steel, but the principle still applies.

What I don't like is that most technology now is developed for the purposes of surveilance or warfare, not for the betterment of the human race.

T

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 30