LookieNoNookie
Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote:
ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie Actually, his (Kirata's) argument is flawless. Well thanks, I was pretty confused, but you've set me straight now. quote:
You don't have to agree with the argument...but 168 million spent in any number of ways is going to create a shitload of jobs regardless of opinion. No kidding? (No...really!) How is it going to create jobs when 70 people received $1 million each and I believe it was six that received in excess of $4 million. Who are they going to employ? (Others). Oh, wait, I get it. (Do you?) Their money will "trickle down" to everyone else. (Indeed...it would appear that we agree). Sorry, been there, done that, didn't work. (And you own what business...sorry...I may have misplaced your position in life...my error). quote:
When you consider all the technology involved (software, hardware, GPS, vector controls, composites)...it's more than a bunch (of jobs). Simply because the average person can't afford...or will never ride in...a C5....is no reason to disallow the argument. No reason at all, because I have no idea what the hell you just said. Perfectly understandable....it happens...it's okay...I forgive you for your lack. (BTW, the AIG argument was a different thread, this was about JPMorgan, which you seem not to have bothered to read) Again my error....I'm sure I missed the main point of your argument...I apologize...it doesn't change mine.
< Message edited by LookieNoNookie -- 3/25/2009 5:34:05 PM >
|