|
Mercnbeth -> RE: Is punishment really just funishment (12/21/2008 9:26:23 AM)
|
~ Fast Reply ~ I detest inflicting punishment. I LOVE inflicting pain. There's no "fun" involved in punishment. Punishment, or simply the need to punish, represents failure. The mental anguish involved; "Did I set up conditions for failure?", "Was the failure a cry for attention?", "What caused the failure?"; is punishment for both of us. The process of resolution is cathartic, but painful. Any physical sensation only provides a demarcation point for going forward. What it is, the intensity, is immaterial. It occurs only to serve as a end, a resolution of the failure and a plan to go forward. Usually tears flow from both of us. Perhaps they are an indication of successful 'catharsis'. Fortunately there hasn't been many occasions where we've needed to go through this process. There is no punishment involved when I am enjoying beth and placating my sadistic desires while she is relishing in an orgasmic bliss of her masochistic identity. What we do is 'FUN'. Ironically no punishment has ever come close to the pain, or intensity of sensation involved when we have fun and 'play'. I can't remember the last day, when I haven't inflicted 'fun', and beth usually has the marks to prove it. Come to think of it, I don't think I've ever inflicted marks when punishing. As she enters our room with my morning coffee while writing this I smile at the marks from last night and the couple of new ones from this morning. I know I wouldn't be smiling if I were being reminded of punishment. So NO - punishment is really not "funishment".
|
|
|
|