rosanegra
Posts: 277
Joined: 1/1/2006 Status: offline
|
Pardon me for rambling.. but here are a couple of thoughts. There is such a thing as an "escape clause" in a vanilla relationship.. or at least a vanilla marriage. Do the words, "equitable division of assets" and "alimony" mean anything to anybody? Every person, kinky or not, has standards for what they will give to and take from a relationship. There are some vanilla couples in which one half will stay at home and take care of the house (and any little ones they may have) while they other works. There are also kinky couples that work like this. In other relationships, both people work and divide bills evenly.. I can tell you that being a "housewife," isn't as easy as it may sound. Being responsible for every little thing that gets cooked or cleaned is time consuming.. and especially when your other half is a soldier. I can't count how many hours I have spent doing things relating to the military that I definitely was not getting paid for... this is why when Daddy is making a financial decision that will have a major impact on our lives and/or standard of living, he asks for my opinion... I've actually made the mistake of telling him, "it's your money, I don't have much say in how you spend it," before.. to which his reply was, "It is your money too.. you know as well as I do that your job is the harder one." I'm not sure I agree with that, but I do a lot for someone that doesn't really have a job right now. When I was working on top of that, it was beyond draining. I could start an entirely new topic to discuss this but.. what I am saying is that for some people, setting aside money so that the person they are bringing to them won't end up floating up a creek I am sure you all know the name of without a paddle is a perfectly reasonable thing to do. I never felt the need for that, since I knew when I moved here and married Daddy that it would work out, one way or another... and if that, for whatever reason, it did not.. I have friends and family that would help me put my life back together. But I didn't have much when I came here anyway, so it was really kind of an easy decision to make. I had very little to lose, and therefore every reason in the world to dive in without hesitation. I'm glad I did too.. I would do it again in a heartbeat for the happiness I've experienced in the last year. If I'd actually had a life where I was living before I came here, things might have been different. I was a fairly independent person then (I still am to an extent, but at the same time it feels good to be able to depend on someone, and know that they will do right by me), and I would have most likely insisted on putting together my own safety net.. but that is not how everybody is. I think it is okay for the people who want to do it... and it's not for the people who don't want to. It's really very simple.. if you're a submissive and you trust somebody to make sure you're going to be okay regardless of the outcome... and if you're a Dominant and you want to provide that safety net.. then that is just as fine as the alternative. Some people have money to throw away. Others do not. Some people have money they can spare to make sure that someone they are uprooting will not be left high and dry.. others do not. Some of those who have the ability choose to use it.. and others do not. It isn't really a matter of right and wrong.. it is a matter of personal choice, trust, and, dare I say it, compatibility. After all, is a relationship between someone who wants that safety net and somebody who doesn't want to provide it going to get very far? Maybe, but probably not.
_____________________________
"If it weren't for the gutter, my mind would be homeless."
|