Aneirin
Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006 From: Tamaris Status: offline
|
My old aircooler passed every test the British M.O.T. system could throw. So it cracked heads every 10k or more, but it still passed. In fact I was told my air cooler was cleaner than many more modern water cooled motors. It was not an old motor, but a remanufactured engine, a recon, but it was reliable and frugal on fuel given what it was pushing. Given an air flow, why carry around all that extra weight of water and associated ancilliaries when a 1943 designed motor is good enough. Surely with modern technology and engineering a light weight air cooled motor can be produced that is as good as or better than it's equivalent to it's water cooled similarity. Maybe it is that water cooling presents no challenge to designers, it is cooled by water and that water cooled by air, designers would have to to think more if water was taken out of the equation. To note, the hottest day of the year some years ago, I was stuck in a four hour long tailback due to a wagon jacknifining on the carriageway ahead. My air cooled motor ran cool, some 45 degrees centrigrade, whilst more modern water cooled cars over heated and died all around. Given that and another incident where the hottest day another year I transported the limit in weight across two countries on only three cylinders, I have much faith in the air cooled design. Given that I was a convert from the water cooler, I trusted my engine not, so with realtime gauges I monitored my motor and with monitoring I found it given the aerodynamics of what I drove, it's weight and all, a fair engine it was, sixteen hundred cc's pushing near on two tonnes.
_____________________________
Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone
|