|
IronBear -> RE: May you discuss personal problems here (11/8/2008 11:52:05 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP I read somebody's sig line which said something to the effect of she is never allowed to talk about her relationship or ask advice about it, the gist that I gathered is she is obligated to lie about it and present it in a way that makes it seem perfect. Obviously if I have a problem I talk to him about it. But sometimes it isn't something I can find the words for, so I bring a question to the boards to try to get my nebulous feelings narrowed down. And sometimes, if it relates to how I am handling something, not something between us, it helps to get other people's thoughts and suggestions. I always assume that if someone isn't allowed to vent outside, get outside info, get confirmation that this is common to other people or just other subs, that what that says is that the dominant in question is insecure as all get out. Yes, if there's anyway to misread or misinterpret people will do so. So what? Why does it matter if someone on the other side of the world holds a wrong opinion about him or me, or our relationship? Why would anyone care if someone they will never meet thinks badly of them? It really is somewhat of a conundrum isn't it? I believe there is no satisfactory answer and there are too many questions begging for an honest reply. Whilst I am rather loth to chriticise an owner's way of handling his property (sub/slave), I do wonder if his instructions of "..she is never allowed to talk about her relationship or ask advice about it.." if this is a sign of a Dominant being unsure of his authority and ability. Now many decades ago when I had just initiated my 2nd wife into Wicca and was just forming what was to me the Mother Covemn for Western Australian Wicca a decade later, I'd be teaching he only to fine that she was contacting other friends in the craft to asking them if I was right. It hurt like hell and certainly created some minor trust issues. yet I kjnew my abilities and knowledge and had already in fact trained all those she turned to for there were none others in the state who have equal or more knowledge or experience. She, when I gently tasked her about it, as mortified when she realkised the implication and how it could have been misconstrewed. I use this as one example.. Untill we know more about both people I believe it best to keep this discussion on general grounds and hypothetical ones too.
|
|
|
|