daddysprop247
Posts: 1712
Joined: 6/24/2005 From: DC Metro area Status: offline
|
i wonder why it seems to be assumed that because a punishment is physical, that the beating/spanking/whipping/whatever is ALL there is to it? why the assumption that those who use physical punishment don't also sit down and discuss the problem and come up with a plan to ensure said offense does not occur again? most of my punishments have been physical. sometimes a very hard spanking, something a whipping with the belt, sometimes an all-around beating (fists and feet). but it's not as if i comment some offense, my Master beats me, and that's all there is to it. unless it's a minor, obvious offense (like speaking inappropriately, not completing chores on time, etc.), then there is always serious discussion where we root out just what went wrong, and how to prevent it from happening again. but before this discussion, i am getting the snot beat outta me. absolutely. because that is what works for us. when i do something wrong, it upsets my Master, naturally. He will have feelings of frustration, disappointment, irritation, possibly even anger. physically punishing me serves as a release for all of those negative feelings and all of that negative energy. it also gives me my comeuppence quite effectively...especially considering the fact that i hate pain in any form. then, afterwards, when that physical energy is released and things are cooled down, he talks to me about it. why did i do this? what has he done or not done that has let such a thing be possible? why am i not conducting myself as i should? and what will be done so that this will not happen again? in many ways, it is like a Parent/child dynamic. my Master is not Daddy for nothing. and part of his role as Father is to teach, guide and discipline, so that i will continue to grow. except that whereas the typical parent of an UM wants their child to grow into independence, because my Daddy is also my Master, my growth needs to be as his slave.
|