RealSub58
Posts: 1073
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: greeneyes600 Should a submissive be restrained to take what their master wants them to take? It totally depends on the exchange dynamic. I have never been restrained. The control of HIS being is restraint enough. I can see the point of the sub standing to take what's given, without movement, without a sound....but then it's the sub who has the power...over herself. NO... there a reason she is silent and has no movement ..the control of his mind and person. If she is retsrained, immobilised, then the restrainer is the one with the power, over her. He decides she isn't to move, he decides she stays there until he is finished with her. There is a gigantic canvernous different between her willingness to submit to his power/control and the control he assumes.... until he is finished...in a play scene. My view only of course...what do you think? Strong personalites, IMHO find giving up their own contro to another sumething they must wrap their mind around, not just restrained physically. It mental/physcholoigal vs emotional. physical. That's why I think. Strong opinionated does make for easy obedience submission. IMHO
|