Ialdabaoth
Posts: 1073
Joined: 5/4/2008 From: Tempe, AZ Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad If someone registers as a peer, I will relate to them as such. Apart from that, I try to keep good intentions in mind, fully aware that intentions are entirely subjective. But the simple fact is that when a man averts his eyes from mine, or a woman yields and turns pliant, the biological mandate is in effect: we are complementary, and it would really be ludicrous of me to deny the role nature has reserved for me. The real difference is whether you're going to do well by those that bend to your will, or simply use them, even use them up. I don't see an objective problem with either, but I'd probably interfere with the latter, and approve of the former. Personally, I really don't have a problem with skimming cream off the top, but it's not in me to be a tyrant. Except, of course, in relation to those who seek just that. Ask yourself what you would do if you became a god. Then ponder that, in times past, a god was a man who fully accepted his place as such. Of course, nowadays, people have other ways to respond than dropping to their knees to worship, and the cultural influence opposes such responses, replacing innate authority with assigned / conferred authority. Pop and media icons are exceptions, although worship doesn't involve kneeling. Anyway, if you were to buy this explanation, or if you became whatever your notion of a god is, would you accept that role? Would you allow others to worship you? Would you allow them to serve at your feet? Could you take for granted the authority to direct their lives as you saw fit, in accordance with your own overall plan for them? What, in that case, would your plan be? Personally, I'd like to think I'd have some moderation (why have a harem of millions when Jolie will do nicely, for instance?), and I'd like to think I'd be a more beneficial one than many that have been revered and worshipped throughout the ages, but there's really no question as to accepting the role: I'd do it, and not for the power itself. When I answered those questions for myself, a lot of things became clear. I hope you can learn more of yourself in asking them, as well. I've been spending some time processing this question before coming back to it. The problem is, I have a multitude of different paths I would like to take if I became a god - perhaps the first thing I would do, as a god, is to determine whether it was possible to explore all the possible avenues, even the conflicting ones. If I became the sort of God I want to be, I would probably spend a few eternities exploring philosophy and ethics from the "other side", before determining whether it was logically possible to create a world without disappointment or unfulfilled need. I might take some time first to figure out what caused certain needs to arise that are incompatable with others' needs, and whether there was a way to give everyone a genuine opportunity to be happy without edging someone out of their opportunities. On the other hand, if it turns out that godhood is just as petty and limiting as humanity, just on a grander scale, I'd probably just work on creating races of super-beings and guiding them to higher and higher achievements until I got bored of it. Then I might go and explore with different configurations of matter and consciousness until I found something I hadn't anticipated, and work with it awhile until I understood how it worked. After a few billion years of exploring the universe and all it's possibilities, I might get bored enough to 'check out'. But I'm not sure that any of this is the sort of 'godhood' you're describing. If I became the sort of cult leader that was seen as a god, but with the same human limitations that I currently possess, I'd probably devote a massive amount of available resources to increasing my intelligence and power through technology - while amusing myself by sculpting my followers' minds and bodies into new, interesting, and useful shapes. After a few decades I'd probably shift from intelligence augmentation to lifespan increase, while taking care of any resource problems that might arise. Which of those is a closer answer to the spirit of your question?
|