MisterCorvidae
Posts: 5
Joined: 5/15/2004 From: Crow Status: offline
|
Good evening (well as I write anyway) I have wondered about this particular term for a while now and have some thoughts about it. Before I go into them I wish to express also my stance. I do not care if my definition is your definition, you may agree or disagree as vehemently as you so desire. My previous experiences in chat rooms and other list or forums has allowed me to develop a fairly well insulated exterior to flame, so have at it should you so desire. I would however make a recommendation that your exterior be as well insulated should things get highly focused and personal. On to 24/7, just what is meant by 24/7? Now I know that in general when someone says 24/7 they are referring to something that is a constant, back pain, heartache, depression, and everyone’s favorite taxes. Granted those are fairly simple and perhaps extreme examples. I read profiles that generally state “I am NOT looking for 24/7” and am curious as to what is meant by that. I shall attempt to elucidate lol yeah right. My thoughts are perhaps they are saying they are only submissive (at this point I am using submissive yet I acknowledge this applies to dominants as well) on Saturday night between the hours of 7P.M. and 2A.M.. Perhaps they are saying they only wish to be submissive (or dominant) during certain phases of the lunar cycle. I really don’t know. I am dominant by orientation, by mindset and by preference and yes 24/7. However does that mean I am 24/7 in the level of intensity that I give to said dominant orientation? No it doesn’t work that way at all, you tend to piss people off if you try to dominate them without consideration. So perhaps 24/7 is a misnomer, perhaps it reflects that said submissives, or dominants, are submissive or dominant all the time simply varying in their degrees of intensity. I happen to be a firm believer in the various manner of saying this “I am a dominant/submissive but I am not your dominant/submissive”. Is it possible that 24/7 refers in some way to this? I am not sure. My thoughts on this tend to define it this way. Or rather perhaps my simplistic view of things tends to. Assume I have a submissive, assume she is married and we are in this D/s relationship with the partner’s full knowledge and consent. Assume she has children, job, all the vanilla appurtenances that make life possible and comfortable. As my submissive she is collared, owned, directed to whatever extent we have reached in our relationship. Is she my submissive while she is at work? Yes, however seeing as it is her livelihood we are discussing it is unrealistic to expect her to drop to her knees and call me “Daddy or Sir” when I call or come in to the office isn’t it? Same can be said when I go to pick her up for the weekend or evening or whatever as well, wouldn’t you say? After all her partner may well accept and agree buit it is highly unlikely they want to be actively exposed don’t you think? I could give more situations but if you haven’t gotten the picture by now you are unlikely to. Does it make her less submissive to observe the proprieties of the vanilla settings I mentioned? In my opinion not at all, it may even perhaps make her more of a submissive to be able to handle those situations with the inner knowledge that soon she shall indeed be in a more active state of her submission to me. Apply the same line of reasoning to the dominant for a more rounded out viewpoint. So what do you think ? Sincerely Crow
_____________________________
Insanity could be: taking the same action over and over while each time expecting different results. “To thine own self be true, And it must follow, as the night the day, Thou canst not then be false to any man.” William Shakespeare
|