Demspotis
Posts: 61
Joined: 3/11/2005 Status: offline
|
Barack Obama is half-white and half-Kenyan. Despite the fact that he chooses to identify as "African-American", his heritage really has very little in common with most African-American blacks. He is not a descendants of West African slaves imported generations ago, he is the son of a free East African. His heritage therefore has about the same similarity to most blacks in the US, as the child of a Russian immigrant in Brooklyn, NY has with descendants of English people who came here on the Mayflower. In other words: ethnic group, language, culture, religion are all different, with the only real similarities being similar skin color, and coming from the same continent (but opposites ends of the continents in question.) In fairness, though, Obama probably doesn't have much choice about identifying as he does, because of the nature of the racism that occurs here, including the illogical notion that being part black = being only black. (This is known as the "one-drop rule", formerly a legal principle in the US, now deemed unconstitutional.) As for Tiger Woods, whereas Obama is simply bi-racial, Woods is truly and prolifically multi-racial, having (if I recall correctly) several kinds of Asian, as well as white, black and Native American ancestry. So it's even sillier to call him "black", and he does not identify himself that way, either: he coined a word "Caublinasian" to describe his mixture of heritages. Concerning one-drop rules... the only one that might actually sense is to identify a person with [at least] one-drop of blood from heritage that is indigenous to where one is.
|