popeye1250
Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006 From: New Hampshire Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 quote:
But where in the Constitution does it say that a *Corporate Lobbyist* can "redress" the govt on behalf of a *foreign country* to get that foreign country U.S. Taxpayer Dollars in "foreign aid" in the expectation of making a "commission" from whatever U.S. Taxpayer Dollars they can get and bribing congressmen and senators with "donations" to their campaigns or the lack thereof? It's all one and the same, popeye. The First Amendment is fairly explicit on the point: quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Demonizing lobbyists will not alter the sobering reality that, under the Constitution, all people are allowed to petition the government directly on any matter they desire. This includes lobbyists. If a lobbyist's donation to a campaign is bribery, why is a "non-lobbyist's" donation not bribery? Both are made to support candidates that support specific causes and agendas. Both are made to further specific legislative objectives. The mere act of donating to a campaign in and of itself must not be deemed bribery, unless you are prepared to outlaw ALL donations to political campaigns. I will agree that Congress does not do nearly enough to police the patterns of "gift giving" that many who lobby before Congress engage in. But the evil there lies not in the lobbyist for doing what is presumptively legal; the evil lies in Congress for not closing the door to such things and making the gifts presumptively illegal. Congress could do that in a single day if it had the desire. It hasn't. Celtic, I think you just answered your own question. If a state senator in New Hampshire took money for his vote he or she would end up in the state prison in Concord and there are a few still in there for doing just that involving construction companies. Why should Senator Judd Gregg or John Sununu get a "pass" on doing the very same thing? If a politician "takes money" in exchange for his vote that's against the law. It's a crime. Like I said, no-one is "preventing" *anyone* from writing a letter or calling or e-mailing their representatives in government. To call what is going on in Washington now "petitioning government for a redress in greivances" is like comparing.....what's that saying you guys have in Texas about lipstick and pigs?
_____________________________
"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"
|