|
tsatske -> RE: Fashion question (6/10/2008 7:45:54 AM)
|
I do think there is something to the 'men are visual ceatures' thing. But i also think that there are - forgive me, i am one of those people who is always dividing everything inot two or three groups, - two differant 'types' of male subs. I think 'lifestyle' submissives then to be okay with being dominanted in sweat pants, or else learn to be okay with that - at least the ones i have known. The ones who are more, paying a Domme, or cruising a dungeon or club looking for a play partner tonight - are more into the 'look'. But, really, that makes perfectly good sense. a friend of mine who is a pro-Domme said - they are paying $200 an hour, for a scene, not a lifestyle or relationship. For $200 an hour, they have a right to expect the proffessional to come, dressed for the part. That in no way suggests the two 'catagories' don't overlap. You can be using a pro while you search for an owner. You could be owned and, with permission, still play with a pro from time to time. there are endless variations. I am just saying, if it is about a long term relationship, clothes might not be the biggest issue. But if it about getting their freak on for the night, then what is a 'turn on', including the costume, becomes a bigger part of it. this is also one reason that, though i will certainly wear fetish wear for Him, sometimes it annoys me to do so in a club (as opposed to a party where i know everyone). because there are so many male subs who will approach anyone sporting that special combination of having both a cunt and some leather clothes, and beg to be topped. and this leaves me standing there, smoldering slightly, thinking, 'I am wearing a full set of four cuffs, a collar and nipple clamps, all attached by chain, the 'lead to my leash' is in my mouth (which at a local dungeon here, is descriped in the dungeon rules as being a sign for 'i am a sub who does not have permission to talk or socialize at this time), - and you decided that i am a Domme? gee, brillaint deduction, Einstien.'
|
|
|
|