DominantJenny
Posts: 645
Joined: 4/6/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: pinksugarsub So here's my question: is the author over-emphasizing safety? Can there be such a thing as too much concern for physical, personal well-being when meeting a stranger, esp off the 'net, in real life? pinksugarsub I think the list as you posted it is pretty good, actually, but I DEFINITELY think people can go too far/go overboard and miss out on potentially great relationships because they are so paranoid about safety that a minor deviation is treated like a major one. For example...really, using "sir or ma'am", if it feels right, isn't exactly a big risk, and if a dominant requested it and you skipped out on that basis alone, that would be really pretty silly. I agree that it's best to meet as equals...but just a hint of dynamic is hardly going to put you in serious danger. (If you are THAT susceptible, I'm not sure you should be going out alone anywhere!) Another thing...I would prefer that I meet someone without the distraction of another person there, so someone insisting on bringing a friend would be a major turn-off for me, especially if that person already has a safe call set up and has my information, etc. Now, because I don't want to miss out, I'd probably go even if they insisted on bringing the friend...but I know of people who would consider even my resistance to the idea to be such a violation of safety that they would then refuse to meet. That falls in the "overboard" category. Really, safety comes down mostly to common sense, but I do think lists like this serve a purpose...for example, in today's world of knock-out drugs in drinks, the fifth rule about not turning your back on your food/drink is a VERY sensible one that I, frankly, would probably never have thought of on my own. It's a matter of using good judgement and sense to decide where to be flexible and where to draw a line, and, unfortunately, that's something no one can provide you.
|