Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thornhappy quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth Why else would a competent county not having built a nuclear power plant in over 50 years? Are you talking about the US? The last nuke plant ordered in the US was 1973. There is still the storage of high-level waste issue. And you need improvements over the plants of the '70s (more loosely coupled, better user interface, and preferably the type that won't run away or overheat when the water circulation stops. Battelle's done some interesting work in this regard.) There are a lot of complexities in the funding of the plants, funding of research regarding plant operation and waste disposal, and decommissioning; these should be examined before going "Yep, these guys did it so why can't we?" It took a lot of government commitment and funding, and still does, to keep the system going. See this link. Not exactly a free-market system. thornhappy Yeah, my apologies, my fingers were typing from the emotional side of the brain without engaging the quantitative side. I saw it and corrected it, but your post beat the edit. Your issues aside, we wouldn't be building new plants under a 1970's blueprint or with 1970's technology. Your points are well taken. It would take a completely different mind set to get one built. I doubt its possible since the majority of the US population is much more likely to believe a horror story, fairy tail, or worst case scenario than consider pragmatic statistics or what's observable all around them. (See 'global warming') Would you prefer examining the issues for another 50, whoops 25 years, and play catch up then?
|