|
DomAviator -> RE: Born killers (5/27/2008 4:03:30 PM)
|
I think its an interesting theory and one very good justification for genocide, "well they are going to have famines, an ebola outbreak, and will be cornholed by lions anyway so lets depopulate before they suffer" I mean aside from the preemptive killing of a murderer, how about preemptively killing someone who would be better off dead because of something thats going to happen to them. "Excuse me sir, Im with the Temporal Enforcement Bureau and tommorrow youre going to have your BBQ grill explode and will recieve burns over 95% of your body and you will die a month later, please roll up your sleeve so you can be put down now. " Its a slippery slope in general. From a moral standpoint Im not opposed to the idea of killing anyone - man , woman, child, infant, elderly... This was actually raised as an ethics question in my Aviation Preflight Indoctrination.... If you are downed behind enemy lines and hiding, and a small boy stumbles on you while looking for a ball, do you let him go or do you kill him? The "correct" answer is you kill him because he could compromise you and your duty is to return to the fleet to rejoin the fight if at all able, However, I disagree with the premise of this thread because once you start fucking around with mother nature all hell breaks loose.
|
|
|
|