BitaTruble
Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006 From: Texas Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Leatherist Priorities in seeking relationships seem a bit skewed. Is it really such a bad thing to look at vanilla life together as the most important thing? To me, vanilla is just a label which means non-alternative sex acts. No more, no less. Neither good or bad, but not something that I'm really into or that's a part of my life except on rare occasions. As such, I don't have a 'vanilla' life. I just have a life, period. Vanilla, for me, is certainly not the most important thing in life so for me, it would be bad were I to consider it such. quote:
Or do you think we see it discussed to little because it's not exciting enough? I think it's rarely discussed because this is a BDSM website. I think vanilla sex is rarely discussed on a knitting website, on a modeling website and on a pet forum. If it's not the main purpose of the site which you're on, why bring it up? I don't consider going grocery shopping, paying bills etc part of 'vanilla' life .. just part of life and while I sometimes might talk about those things in the off topic forum, they're not the reason that I'm here. I'd be interested to see how other folks define 'vanilla' and why. Is it about sex or is it about life, the universe and everything? For me, vanilla is just about sex. BDSM is about sex and/or play for various reasons (cumming, catharsis, art etc.) D/s & M/s are about relationships. I'm compartmentalized that way. Does vanilla sex discussion have a place in the General BDSM discussion forum? If so, why? If not, why not? ::just curious as to what others think:: Celeste
< Message edited by BitaTruble -- 4/18/2008 9:37:53 PM >
_____________________________
"Oh, so it's just like Rock, paper, scissors." He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."
|