chellekitty
Posts: 3923
Joined: 3/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Drummerpunk7 I can learn much from Stephann. That being said, I don't like the idea of collars that can be taken off at any time, but the slave alone. If a slave requires it to be removed, it should be at the discretion of the master. If grandma is coming over for dinner, the slave should request the master to remove it for the alotted time. The problem with wedding rings is that they are too easily removed. You can't very well hide a steel collar(not easily). If my slave wants to remove her collar, I want to know why. Not everyone is the same though, so to each his own, and to the slaves, whatever their master says. in my personal experience, i have gotten to the point where i could not remove a simple buckle on collar (or any other kind) had i wanted to without my Master's permission (i really prefered that he do it) for any reason, even something as simple as it is leather, and i needed to take a shower and it was not locked on and he wasn't home... for me it wasn't about whether or not it was permanently attached or locked on, it could have been velcro-ed or magnetically attached on, it wouldn't have made a difference, the symbolism for me was i would not remove the symbol of our relationship for any given period of time unless he gave me specific direction to do so myself...but it was still just symbolism...the relationship did not end because i needed to take a shower, or because i was getting in the pool or because grandma - well actually because the primary's parents - were coming over and the tag had his name on it and i was "just a roommate" as far as they were concerned...and all the same, i could not do it, no lock, no permanent attachment needed... did that make any sense? chelle
_____________________________
One thing I know: the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who will have sought and found how to serve. ~Albert Schweitzer
|