ownedgirlie
Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: GoddessGlory Do you believe in peace is a possibility for humanity, the absence of war, poverty, racism, major violence and discrimination? I don't believe it is possible nor do I think it should be. OK I realize I just totally quoted .dark. on that, but hey, I feel that way. quote:
If so, what place do you believe BDSM have in possibility of world peace? Will BDSM be the same? (I ask this because a lot of fetishes and BDSM practices come from social taboo and roles. I believe if we lived in a more peaceful state most taboo ideas and imposed social roles will deminish therefore so-called fetishes won't have to be "fetishes" but normal sexual behavior based on your sexual development and taste. And our collective ideas of degradation, humiliation and punishment would probably change too.) I believe society evolves and what was once viewed as abnormal becomes normal over time. Sometimes it is pushed that way and sometimes it is a natural occurance. I would imagine as society evolves, some of the BDSM practices people engage in would, too. If, say, kissing my Master's feet in a busy airport (as I've done) didn't raise eyebrows as something "different" or "odd" and were as common as watching friends hug, it wouldn't have the same effect that it does now. I suspect the lines of what is considered "fringe" will always merge outward over time. This frightens some people and excites others. quote:
Do you believe that humanity is a patriarchal? If so, do you think there will ever be a time when humans will become "matriarchal" or maybe a more equaliterian society? No and no, and I believe having vast differences is a healthy thing. quote:
Do you believe in equality? Equality in what? Between humans? Between humans and the animal world? Between sexes, races, religions? Within the confines of a relationship? quote:
Do you believe in natural sexual superiority? If so explain why. I used to. I no longer do. It is a sexy concept but it is unrealistic. quote:
Does dominant mean superior? Dominant in what context? A dominant gene? A dominant personality? And superior to what? quote:
What is superiority? And what makes a person superior? Again I ask, superior to what? quote:
Is the Queen bee in bee society superior, more important, better than, smarter than any other bees in the society? Are male lions superior to female lions? Are alpha wolves superior to other wolves? Are bonobo females superior to male bonobos? (I believe that there is no such things as "superiority" in the animal kingdom. I believe that each species live the best life it can for the greater good of the whole ecosystem, not only the species. Just because a strong animal is able to overbear or kill another doesn't mean it has superior or it has won). You list "superior", "more important," "better than" and "smarter than" synonymously. I disagree with that premise so I can't answer your question. quote:
What's the different between a dominant person and a non-submissive person? One could write an entire thesis on this. In what context? My shoot-from-the-hip answer would say a dominant person carries a personality type that is inclined toward a preference of leadership, decision-making, directing, and being otherwise in control of people and/or situations. Whether or not they're any good at it is another subject. A non-submissive person may or may not be so inclined. quote:
Does there have to be degradation, humiliation and physical "abuse" in order for a person to dominate a slave (I'm thinking in terms of lets say American slavery and tactics that slave owners use to mentally enslave African slaves. Like rape, name calling, restrictions and whippings. What's the healthy difference between that and consensual slavery other than "abuse")? No there does not. I wouldn't assume abuse does not exist in consensual slavery, nor would I use it as a defining line. There are slaves who exist as slaves by their own accord and slaves who do not.. quote:
What makes a dominant person dominant over another? Does there have to be a subject to give power for a person to be dominant? A dominant person can only dominate one who submits to him/her. Whether or not a subject exists does not negate a dominant personality, however. quote:
Do you agree that some BDSM is based off of societial sexual guilt? If so, why should BDSM players encourage the guilt through play? Shouldn't we be combating guilt and taboo? For example, why should a female slave who loves to fuck and suck be called a slut just because society brands a woman who likes to fuck and suck a slut? Or why should men with small penises be made to feel worthless because of their small penises by a dominant woman through play? Is it healthy just because it is "consensual" and the slave likes it? BDSM is based on the preferences of those who engage in it. Such preferences are unique to the person who has them. Society might shape such preferences...or not. Why should we combat guilt and taboo? No one can "make" another feel a certain way unless they are given such power to do so. quote:
Do you ever think BDSM practices will be of the norm and not just a dark art or alternative lifestyle? Probably. quote:
Do you think the rest of humanity would ever catch on to power play, power exchange, role reversal, consensual pain infliction and humilaition, practical slave owning, polyamorous relationships and so on? Some will, some won't. Some people still have trouble with the concept of being gay. In some parts of the world, "inter-racial relationships" are still taboo. quote:
Do you feel that the BDSM community should have the responsibility of sharing what we know about power, control and sex with the rest of the world or should we keep the fun to ourselves? I have a personal responsibility to be true to myself and live according to my personal beliefs. I am bar far a trend-setter, I can only live as the person I am. If the way I live my life has an affect, positive or negative, on what those around me think of BDSM or any other part of my life, than it is a natural occurance and as it should be. I am not an evangalist or apologetic for any particular cause. quote:
I can go on forever, but this is enough for now. Please answer what you can/want. Whew, I made it to the end!
|