LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
Well, I just heard the best one yet - some professor from the LSE (London School of Economics - home of many nutjobs) has proposed that smokers be made to apply for a permit annually, in order to be able to purchase tobacco products. No permit, no purchase. The idea being that the effort to apply for a permit will put some off and so stop them smoking. Professor Nutjob is clearly a very deep thinker. He is suggesting the government get to assemble a database of people who smoke - including of course those who acquire tobacco to mix with certain other smokable substances, substances which I believe are rather popular at the LSE..... substances which are about to be reclassified as dangerous illegal substances. He is ignoring that the country is already flooded with smuggled tobacco products from Europe, where the cost of a packet of cigarettes is as low as 80p (against £5-00 here with the duties and taxes) - and people who dont want to apply for a licence will simply increase this illegal supply as they move to it. He is though, its nice to know, firmly of the opinion that such a system could and would never be extended to control the purchase of alcohol or to control the overweight from buying the wrong sorts of food (as determined by some other Professor Nutjob, presumably). I am of the opinion that nutjobs should be forced to apply for a licence to speak publicly. If the argument is that smoking is bad for me so I must be licensed, then it follows that since his spouting off nonsense like this is bad for his health (since it incites others to want to beat him severely), he should have to get a licence too, to inhibit him from such behaviours. E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|