Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: male psychology question


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: male psychology question Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 7:40:49 AM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
That is true. My own experience is most likely not like anyone else's and perhaps not applicable. I will say, that had we separated physically that might have been a solution to that specific issue 

Jeff

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 7:43:19 AM   
SubbieOnWheels


Posts: 590
Joined: 12/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

An analysis of the specific conflict and behavioural situations is required. We do not have sufficient information to do so.

Rule, as usual, you have cut right to the heart of things.

_____________________________

Bethical
Beat me, strike me, take away my reindeer! I'll never tell! -- Walt Kelly, Pogo Possum
I yam what I yam - Popeye

http://www.myspace.com/bethical_wheels


(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 8:07:50 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
fair enough - let me compose a synopsis and I'll return later

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to SubbieOnWheels)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 8:23:18 AM   
Nikko1962


Posts: 31
Joined: 2/7/2007
Status: offline
While I loathe offering opinions in a public forum such as this, I'll take a stab.  The author David Deida has some very insightful thoughts on men, women and relationships.  Deida speaks specifically to the question from the OP.  The man's "vision" in life versus his relationship.  He speaks generally in archetypes.

I suspect that 50% of those that read him will completely disagree and be offended and outraged.  His famous book, "The Way of the Superior Man", and the book I'm linking to "It's a Guy Thing", explained to me, many of the questions I've had for too many years.  I suspect that even the title of the Superior Man book will raise eyebrows to the politically correct

http://books.google.com/books?id=p-TuDWZ0hRcC&printsec=frontcover&dq=david+deida&ei=s2G0R4-AJpOMtAPMjuSfBQ&sig=JezD2-KHNcmnbQkDt6Ohji5Gi-A#PPP1,M1

As a straight male sub, while reading the Superior Man book, I felt that all that the book had to do was substitute "Masculine" with "Domme" and "Feminine" with "sub" and it would describe the energy for me in a scene or relationship.  As Deida also qualifies ad-nauseum in his work, he and I are NOT saying that Masculine is better or more powerful.  He's talking about personal energy. Probably more importantly, personal sexual energy.

The energy that he discusses, a sexual polarity (in my opinion, the "chemistry" or "majic") is what attracts us to each other in the beginning.  His idea is that to keep the sexual energy going, the polarity of the individuals whether man/man, woman/woman, woman/man must remain distinct to create the chemistry.  As soon as we fall into the 50/50 everything is equal, the budget, housekeeping, sex, keeping tabs, that the chemistry/energy (the honeymoon stage of a relationship) falls apart.




_____________________________

Everything you want is on the other side of fear.

If you are going to hide in the haystack from me, at least make a little noise.


http://www.myspace.com/124184605

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 8:45:26 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
I just wonder if perhaps alot of women are just too clingy? I don't know.

I actually don't mind live with a man, we get alot great. Sometimes we do stuff together, sometimes we do our own thing. It's nice to have someone that gives a damn if you go missing. Someone to bitch about women to, etc etc....


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 8:47:56 AM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
Could be............ for me I think the perfect deal would be separate residences, maybe 10 min. apart. Or......2 farm houses at opposite ends of the farm?

Ward

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 9:09:42 AM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Communication does not necessarily solve the problem, it just exposes it. At some point solutions are required. I am not doubt odd in my feelings...:) but I am aware

Jeff


Very true. Communication is not a solution, but the pathway to the solution.

_____________________________



(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 9:18:54 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
I do not mean to belittle this thread but I do believe this type of thinking is psycho-babble. The big differences in thinking between men and women are governed by the amount and type of hormones in the system.

It is the built in need, governed by nature, to pass on genes.  This behavior is essential for the race to survive. Nothing more nothing less.

Butch

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 9:26:23 AM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
I disagree, I think it is individualized. My brother for instance hates being away from his wife for more than a few hours.He has no real emotional need for,  "space"

Jeff

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 9:27:24 AM   
Aneirin


Posts: 6121
Joined: 3/18/2006
From: Tamaris
Status: offline
I have been married, and I will admit to trying my absolute best to make the marriage work despite  very real difficulties that existed before hand. I am a case of despite what people say, I will give it my damnedest as everyone is different.

But the marriage failed, primarily the initial difficulty saw the end of that but here I sit knowing I could not have tried any harder than I did. I gave it my best shot.

So, the psychology of it all I have examined and seem to be coming to some sort of understanding. Though marriage or the act of staying together in a marriage like situation is not for all, it does not work for all so is there not a recipe for instant success.

Cutting down to the basics of attraction and there its reason I suppose, maybe it is a cynical view but it is a practical view.

Male meets female, male courts female, sex is good,closeness is good.Male marries female, male builds nest, both have offspring, usually male feeds offspring until they fly the nest.

At this point, the job of furthering our species is done. From here on comes difficult waters.Male or female often questions their feelings as to the other half with sometimes inevitable results. One time happy partnerships seem to disintegrate.

So, my thoughts are is it that staying with one partner for life is an unnatural thing, If it is natural, is it that monogamy is unatural .

Perhaps I am jaundiced in my view, but if it were not for the requirement of offspring, are two people meant to stay together.

If one knows they are unable to mother or father offspring, would long term partnership be a good idea? No need for nest building and if there was, it would be an empty nest which would eventually cause problems.

But all theory is smashed when it is that two people come together in later life after having been previously married and then divorced, partnerships when this happens seem to go from strength to strength.


_____________________________

Everything we are is the result of what we have thought, the mind is everything, what we think, we become - Guatama Buddha

Conservatism is distrust of people tempered by fear - William Gladstone

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 9:27:50 AM   
CalifChick


Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Could be............ for me I think the perfect deal would be separate residences, maybe 10 min. apart. Or......2 farm houses at opposite ends of the farm?


Whenever he was doing big bad things that hurt me (not that good kinda hurt), I found that the million little things he did also drove me crazy.  But when we were in a good place, the little things didn't matter.

Cali
(who is tired of hiding in Jeff's garage and wishes he would let her live in the main house dammit)

_____________________________

AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 9:37:11 AM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
I  certainly can't speak for anyone else on this. I have already copped to the fact I am odd..:)

And the garage? would be to close.:)

Jeff

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 9:38:35 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Could be............ for me I think the perfect deal would be separate residences, maybe 10 min. apart. Or......2 farm houses at opposite ends of the farm?

Ward


How about 30-40 miles. Close enough to visit yet not get on one another's nerves.

June


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 9:46:42 AM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
It sounds like heaven is in Iowa

Kevin Costner

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 9:50:42 AM   
lauren0221


Posts: 681
Joined: 8/29/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

It sounds like heaven is in Iowa

Kevin Costner


Well, duh:)

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 11:25:19 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
Lauren, I forgot you were an Iowan..........what part of the state are you in?

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to lauren0221)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 12:07:33 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

OK - this is for the guys out there, and for those who love them.

I have this theory, that men need to have a sense of independence and freedom which is in direct conflict with the love they feel for their wives and the pair bonding of a relationship, which make them dependent on her love and support and limits their sense of freedom.

As such, men find themselves in a position where this conflict is often displaced into other expressions which regardless of the expressions themselves, are attempts at asserting a sense of independence and freedom within the context of the relationship with their wives. They value their wife and her love highly, so they are unable to express the conflict they feel to her directly for fear of hurting her, and yet the displaced expression of that conflict is at least confusing for her and sometimes hurtful nevertheless.

Anyone have any thoughts, comments or insights?

E


Huh?

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 12:22:15 PM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
OK – an attempt at some background;

The problem behaviour and attitude is comprised of several elements, arising from several aspects of what I believe to be the same root conflict.

-          First, there is a seeking of self-assertion in the damaging world of drink and cannabis; of course lots of people engage in consumption of these things, but here there is a definite flavour not only of asserting himself against her preference that he’d consume at more normal levels, but also distancing himself from the conflict by self-anaesthesia. There may also be an element of self-directed spite in some sort of self-punishment for his feelings.
-          Second, there is an overwhelming attitude of hopelessness and helplessness in life when it comes to politics, banking, earning a living and so on in the UK; its as if he only just realised that the world is organised in such a way that his power to change anything or make anything of his life is severely compromised - something which most realise much earlier in life and adjust to and just get on with what they can change and what they can make of life. This is manifested in several ways, but the most indicative is a desire to move to Spain, which is some sort of Paradise in his mind where all these things no longer apply – when of course, they do, because they are part of him. Again, this wish to relocate I see as rooted in the desire to assert self-control and freedom; escape from the sense of control he feels under.
-          Third, there is a need to keep secrets about some things (which I’m not prepared to disclose) – or at least to maintain the illusion that he has secrets, for his wife knows about the matter. Again, this urge to keep some things to himself I believe arises from a need to maintain independence in some way.
-          Fourth, and this is strange given the third, a total openness about certain sexual desires for which his wife has expressed disinterest, and which upset her by way of his insistence on repeating them and declaring them more preferential to him than their sex life. It would seem that her disinterest is taken as a rejection of him and his insistence on bringing them up repeatedly whilst withholding from her seems to be an act of spite against her – again it says to me that he wishes to assert his freedom against her.
-          Fifth, the issue of the daughter. Aside from his wife, he shares the house with his wife’s adult daughter – he has a daughter too, but they are not on good terms and she lives a long way away. The daughter is a lovely girl, sensible, intelligent and in higher education who keeps herself to herself at home for the most part. Yet she is on the receiving end of a great deal of what I see as his displaced resentment of his wife and indeed of life in general, which again upsets his wife. Being hostile towards the daughter is again an urge to assert freedom against his wife.
-          Sixth, the issue of gender and his view of women. He has a domineering mother who imprinted upon him from birth and to date, that he’s worthless and will never amount to anything, and if only he’d been the daughter she wanted. I believe this has coloured his view of women since and some at least of his anger towards his mother, which he cannot express, is directed at his wife and then displaced to her daughter. He is now living with two women of course – his wife and her daughter, and my impression going from everything else is that he feels in a similar situation as he was growing up with his mother – that he is kept in check by women. Except that now he is a grown man and the angry rebellion against his mother of his youth is now angry rebellion against his wife who has replaced her, and her daughter.
-          Seventh, me. He sees me as a woman, though of course he knows my origins too. When I first made acquaintance he had no problem with me, but as time has passed I sense the same anger towards me as he shows towards his wife and her daughter. He is happy when the four of us are chatting together about general subjects, but at some point the conversation will turn towards more female subjects – and at that point he will exclude himself with an air of impotent childish anger; seemingly refusing to countenance the women having become prominent and in control of the conversation. When he returns, he will do so and remain only if he feels in control of the situation and of course the women in the room. To me it speaks directly of boyhood experience with his mother and his aunts – he feels ignored by those he values and so rejects them and their control of the situation by asserting his independence of them.

So overall, there is a pattern of feeling under the control of women and rebelling against this throughout his life. And at the same time a desire to be with and a high esteem for women. In the case of his wife, this is more acute – he values and esteems her above all women, but this means that his sense of being under her control and so the rebellion against her which has been expressed recently is also more acute. He has always felt the need to assert his independence and freedom from women, but throughout his life has been caught in the trap of also needing women and depending on them. In the case of his wife this is again more acute – he needs her and depends on her support more than any other woman and so the self-assertion is more acute too. And throughout all this there is an inability to deal with the conflict involved, which is then displaced into hurtful behaviour – towards himself, towards third parties and towards his wife.

This at least is how I interpret it, but it would be interesting to know what others think?

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 12:41:41 PM   
ShaktiSama


Posts: 1674
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
I think it is probably a mistake to assume that all people with attachment disorders of the "solitary" type (aka "narcissists") are men and all people with attachment disorders of the "clinging" type (aka "codependent vines") are women.  These are just common stereotypes.  A few people fit them well, but most will not.

Also, there is a very strong distinction in my mind between "independence" and "polyamory".  (Or "non-consensual polygyny/polyandry", which is what many modern men and women practice with dysfunctional, dishonest sexual behavior.)

Many men AND women are happy within relationships that offer a secure bond for property ownership and child-rearing while allowing a looser set of rules for sexual entertainment.  This is different from one partner expecting absolute fidelity and honesty while he or she lies to and sexually betrays his/her partner.  And it's also different from people who are simply introverted or solitary and have the need for long periods of solitude or non-intimate time to feel comfortable and happy, without needing to or wanting sexual intimacy outside of one primary relationship during their "independent" time.

I am sure that men do need independence and freedom; women need it too.  Men also need human contact, reassurance, and support--funny, women seem to need those things as well.  The balance of these needs varies with the individual.  I suspect you will find a much greater pattern of variation within a gender than between genders.

_____________________________

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: male psychology question - 2/14/2008 1:04:35 PM   
Muttling


Posts: 1612
Joined: 9/30/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

OK - this is for the guys out there, and for those who love them.

I have this theory, that men need to have a sense of independence and freedom which is in direct conflict with the love they feel for their wives and the pair bonding of a relationship, which make them dependent on her love and support and limits their sense of freedom.

As such, men find themselves in a position where this conflict is often displaced into other expressions which regardless of the expressions themselves, are attempts at asserting a sense of independence and freedom within the context of the relationship with their wives. They value their wife and her love highly, so they are unable to express the conflict they feel to her directly for fear of hurting her, and yet the displaced expression of that conflict is at least confusing for her and sometimes hurtful nevertheless.

Anyone have any thoughts, comments or insights?

E



Men like women are different and I have had several friends that you would be perfectly describing, but I have a different angle on it.

Independence and freedom are not a particular interest to me in the way you describe them.  I only desire them to the point where I am in the relationship because I choose to be in it and not be trapped in it.  I do enjoy time apart as well as time together, hobbies shared and hobbies not shared.   In short, a pleasant mix.

What is important to me is sense of purpose, need, and belonging.  I'm never happier than when I have a project to tinker with and it's one where there is no pressure to get it done quickly, but it is greatly appreciated none the less.  I also enjoy the reciprocal of that, for the woman to careful plan a delightful evening together or something along those lines.   Thoughtful gifts are nice, but I'm the type who typically buys what I want for myself.  I far prefer something thoughtful be it setting up a surprise poker night with the guys (since it's my surprise I should get to start with extra chips ;) ) or a surprise date for two.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: male psychology question Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141