FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: philosophy quote:
ORIGINAL: luckydog1 His Attorneys admit he is an Alqueda fighter. ...they also admit he was 15 at the time, which makes him a child soldier and not an unlawful combatant........a child soldier who was shot twice in the back after he had withdrawn from the combat wounded.........i mean, be honest, you'd be all over an AQ fighter who shot wounded US soldiers from behind wouldn't you? I'm not sure that his being 15 has anything to do with his combatant status. Do you have a cite or link that gives an age limit in a Law of Land Warfare document or treaty? I think a 15 year old male teenager, found with AQ fighters who are attacking American soldiers is on pretty shaky ground, anyway. There isn't enough information in the article to make any kind of real conclusion, especially seeing how often times a bias or anti-Gitmo or anti-American POV affects reports. Not saying that it is, in this case, but I've seen it enough times to be suspicous. Another interesting fact that you might miss, is that - even though shot twice, and otherwise wounded - it's pretty obvious that he was given some pretty effective medical care. Kinda puts a little crimp in the "murdering American soldiers" narrative. Firm
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|