LunaticDesign
Posts: 42
Joined: 7/5/2007 Status: offline
|
"You have just done exactly the thing you keep defending yourself over and accusing others of doing. You are second guessing every single thing I just wrote. And you haven;t even got it remotely correct. " My intention was not in second guessing what you had written. I was merely addressing points you made in your previous post. I felt as I was being attacked, therefore I defended myself. I apologise if I misinterpreted your post and I did not intend for my responce to have been seen as an attack. Since, it was in error in communication I apologise and will try to be clearer in the future. "Everything you post is YOUR ideas. YOUR thoughts. YOUR opinion. I have already posted elsewhere that I understand you are stating YOUR opinion." Excellent now, hopefully, people will stop accusing me of stating some sort of "law" as opposed to my own opinion. Which, means we can get down to the actual discussion at hand. "Word fetishest do exist." I agree. What ever there is no matter what it is there are probably at least 2 people who get a sexual kick out of it and at least 3 websites devoted to it. I am speaking of BDSM which has had many diffrent meanings to many diffrent people but I have found Bondage/Discipline, Domination/Submission, and Sadism/Masochism to be rather all inclusive. However BDSM is kind of like burger king in the sense that you can have it your way. So you like yours heavy on the BD light on the DS and hold the SM and oh can I have fries with that, ok. Your kink is completely fine with me. There is however a world of diffrence between Fetish and BDSM. The two are similar but not exactly the same. You may define them as the same which is okay but I do not. A fetish is something that you get a sexual charge out of. You may like to smell women's socks and you might even get off on it but the idea of Bondage,discipline,domination, submission, sadism, or masochism turns you off faster than the media misunderstands. BDSM can include fetishes. Personally, I can't imagine BDSM with out fetish but I'm certain that someone out there manages it just fine. "For you its a lifestyle. I don;t live a lifestyle. I live me. For me, BDSM is an acronym, nothing more. These are my thoughts on the subject, not yours. Realise this and that your definitions are not right for everyone and move on. " Well put and an excellent point but you are assuming things about me again. I do not lead a BDSM lifestyle. I merely stated that is a lifestyle to some and that warrants just as much respect as your opinion that it is just an acronym. There is a very large diffrence between lifestyle BDSM, "bedroom" BDSM, and casual BDSM. Neither is better nor worse than the other. They are just diffrent. "I reiterate. It is cool you have your definitions and explanations - but it's not something that will work for everyone." I'm sorry if I have come across as trying to force my definitions for things onto other people. I am simply defining terms as I understand them in an attempt to prevent confusion as to where I am coming from. Defining terms that can have multiple meanings such as BDSM, I believe, is essential before any meaningful discussion can begin. A conversation where there is a constant misunderstanding on foundational points is useless. Dear Mad Rabbit, I'll attempt to address points of your post in the order they were written. Please do not see this as an attempt to pick apart what you have said but an attempt to communicate with expediance "Are these people indenpendently wealthy?" None that I know. Most are pretty much just like everyday average people in the sense they they pay bills and sometimes struggle to make ends meet. "How exactly do they fit in eating, sleeping, seeing family, taking care of kids, and working with the 24 hour 7 day a week endless bondage and S/M sessions?" I think there is a fundamental misunderstanding here. BDSM is not entirely about play to everyone. A 24/7 or TPE relationship is typically more about the D/s than the BD or SM. Though I have heard stories about submissives who have to always wash the dishes with their hands in a yoke. A 24/7 couple might go several weeks without playing but the essence of it is that The dominant is always the dominant and the submissive is always the submissive. The exchange of power and the gift of consent and submission do not end with the end of a session. If you want there are many online articles and books devoted to 24/7 or TPE relationships. I personally do not practice 24/7 or TPE but I've known many who do. It's just like any serious relationship, some fail and some succeed. I have heard it said that "to have a successful 24/7 relationship you first have to have 2 failed ones". This is from a local Dominant who is currently living a 24/7 relationship that is progressing nicely. *** now back on topic, i believe to the current discussion at hand*** First and foremost I will limit my definition of BDSM to actions. If I need to explain this then simply prompt me and I will but I believe this is fairly clear. I would define online BDSM as including the following: Cyber sex, Cam, and forum. Hopefully we all know what cyber sex is but I'll cover how I view it any way. Now this is going to get sticky and I hope I manage to communicate myself accurately and percisely. Of the three cam is the only one that I would consider to be even remotely actual BDSM. Cybersex, while fun for some people, falls more into the realm of a fetish than actual BDSM, since no actual actions have to be preformed. You might say that you have but you may actually just be fantasizing. Cam, I suppose that it would be possible to have a very meaningful session with someone who is using a cam. Since there is a cam there has to be actual actions such as: self bondage, self flagelation, orgasm denial, etc. Forums, I cannot even imagine the effort required to maintain any semblance of BDSM with the time lapse between posts. It would seem that any sexual charge would be diminished by the time it would take to get through a scene. With the time lapse there could be actual pictures or videos posted so actual BDSM might be occuring but I do not believe it would be a prerequisite. Essentially I see Cybersex, and forums as more of a fetish than BDSM. I see it this way because I see BDSM as being more of an action. Cam could be seen as BDSM because it does involve action. So, again I'll restate and expand upon my original point found in my first post. If you're only experianced with BDSM is through cybersex, forum, or cams I would say that you have no real experiance in BDSM. While Cams come closer, being able to direct your flogger to strike the place that you want, or to lead a scene, or to actually give over your control and submission to someone who is there with you in entirely diffrent. Equating experiance with cybersex, forums, or cams to having real experiance in BDSM would be similar to suggesting that someone trained in martial arts from books without ever having faced an opponent would be a more experianced fighter than toothless joe the crazy red-neck that gets in 3 fights a week for the past 10 years. In conclusion I state again that online does not count as real experiance and i strongly recomend that people interested in BDSM get real experiance. If your only interest is in a fetish then by all means continue. Fetish and BDSM are similar but not the same.
|