LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
Given government history in compiling, handling, securing and using personal data and the technology for managing them, the entire idea of a national ID card system is so foolish as to not require any argument about privacy for it to be negated. The arguments put forth about preventing identity theft are stupid - the government itself has recently risked such theft on multiple occasions, by losing information which should not have been possible to lose. If all personal information, or at least a much larger amount of it than is normally available from a single source, is put in one place, then identity theft becomes a far greater danger. The arguments put forth about accessing public services and social security benefits are stupid - these cards will be manufactured, and anything which can be manufactured can be copied - whatever the intricacies of doing so, and the value of fake cards will be such that the intricacies will be worked around by those with the means to do so, as a huge money making venture. The arguments about detecting crime and preventing terrorism are stupid - again, the cards will be possible to copy and to produce, and those with the means and motivation to do so will do so. Do we really believe that organised crime syndicate members and terrorists will apply for and use a government issued card that may later be used to identify them? Every argument which the government has put forward for this scheme has been shot down in flames - their scramble on each occasion to find another argument for them is interesting, and indicative of the possibility that we are not in fact hearing any real reason for the cards because either there is no real reason or because the real reason is something which none of us would accept. And the argument that if one is an honest, upright citizen one has nothing to fear - well, thats the scariest argument of all in my view. E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|