|
sexyred1 -> RE: geography sucks (12/2/2007 10:45:24 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CuriousLord As a teen, I had just as many Internet relationships as real life ones. It's just so much easier to find girls who are a bit more.. well, sentient?.. when not confined to having to select from your middle school's population. It was easier to find a decent girl when I started dual enrolling when I was in highschool, but, meh. I've never really felt my age. Not that I always dated older.. I tended to perfer girls not more than five years older.. but more analytical minds seem to have a great affinity for the net. They conjugated*, looking for eachother. At least, some of them did; I'm rather sure others were likely content without peers. Honestly, right now, I look at most people below fourty as children, even though some of those individuals are literally over twice my age. Ah wells. And this is why I love post-Ph.D.'s- you get to talk to so many brighter minds and get a stipend for it. :D Too bad being a professor doesn't pay much. =/ And this is the part where I realize I'm too tired and I'm ranting, making myself look like an egotistical asshole. Meh. Go me! --- If one pardons my tendancy to rant in this mindset, I suppose my contribution would be that, yes, I certainly agree that distance can suck, and relate to the notion of finding more sutiable partners in the larger accessible population granted by the Internet. *This isn't a typo. It's an old, inside-ish joke. I understand what you are saying about finding suitable partners in a larger accesible pool online, but for me, that is precisely the problem; those suitable potentials are the ones too far away for it to make sense. You can only chat online and talk on the phone for so long, you need to actually be together with someone in order to detect chemistry and find compatibility, it takes proximity. I do know that others have started relationships that were successful online, but I have not had that happen. My relationships were all from meeting in person.
|
|
|
|