Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Decline in Reading


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Decline in Reading Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 6:34:52 AM   
pinksugarsub


Posts: 1224
Status: offline
Americans have declined in recreational reading and test scores have also declined.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/19/arts/19nea.html?ex=1353301200&en=c5ef1aff4461609a&ei=5089&partner=rssyahoo&emc=rss
 
pinksugarsub

_____________________________




Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 9:27:47 AM   
bipolarber


Posts: 2792
Joined: 9/25/2004
Status: offline
Interesting. I wonder if this study takes into account the increased reading of internet material.

I have no doubt that the next generation is going to grow up less literate, easier to be controlled by the minorities in power, and utterly incapable of making informed decisions... television was just the first wave of ignorrance inducing technology.

Want a look at the future? Rent or download Mike Judge's "Idiocracy"


(in reply to pinksugarsub)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 10:15:58 AM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
While Idiocracy is somewhat thought provoking, it's premise falls flat when faced with facts.  Simply put, the intelligence measured by SATs is not inheritable since it's not a useful reproductive trait- but that also means that stupidity isn't inherited either.  Soylent Green on the other hand, seems to be alarmingly prophetic.

The reading link and test scores may be an interesting speculation, but there are a multitude of hypotheses that could be put forth for this decline.  Here- let me throw out one of my own- Kids always use the President as a role model, no matter what anyone says, and with GWB being a moron, test scores have subsequently suffered.

Sam

(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 10:35:10 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
People's WRITING abilities have clearly declined too.  I first noticed this when I heard the letters that ordinary soldiers would write home during the Civil War series by Ken Burns.  Most ordinary Americans today simply would not be able to write like that.  But you can even see a decline over the last 20-30 years.  Whip out a highbrow newspaper from the 1960's or 70's and see how journalists used to write.  But who reads highbrow newspapers in 2007?  Who still writes a real letter?  (And no, e-mail doesn't count.)  People are reading less and writing less, so it's not a huge surprise that their literacy is suffering.

(in reply to pinksugarsub)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 11:08:38 AM   
bipolarber


Posts: 2792
Joined: 9/25/2004
Status: offline
LordandMaster,

A very good point. As a longtime recreational reader, I'm always somewhat taken aback by the difference in quality between the popular writing of 150 years ago, and the drek that is published today. Just try comparing some Johnathan Swift, Mark Twain, or Edgar Allen Poe against the likes of Stephen King, or Ann Coulter, or John Norman.

I think George Orwell was right: control the language, take away the vocabulary, and people become so much more easily controlled.

We might be the first humans on the planet to watch ourselves slip into a dictatorship, because we were all too busy watching TV and playing video games.

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 11:14:54 AM   
HotFaerieMama


Posts: 2617
Joined: 6/14/2007
Status: offline
i read all the time.. i'm a book worm.. and i can write.. ( writing is my strong point ) ... so i am again one of the few that goes against satistics...

(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 11:24:40 AM   
sophia37


Posts: 1433
Joined: 2/7/2006
Status: offline
Lordandmaster has it exactly right. Because of my own learnings and understadning on this matter, I second his post. BUT I can also add, we're forgetting soemthing else. We're losing the understanding of where our culture literally, comes from. Ask most people what western civilization means, and they'll look at you funny.  150 years ago, even "common" people knew. It wasnt just scholars. Hail Columbia! lol 

(in reply to HotFaerieMama)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 12:17:13 PM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
Bipolarber

Umm, I'm not so sure about the quality differences that you're talking about in writing.  I suspect that it's much the same as movies.  Somebody watches Casablanca and says- wow- they made better movies back then.  But Casablanca has floated above all the other dreck that was around at the time- I suspect the same thing happens with books.  Plus, back then, they were more expensive, and there were fewer writers- so editors could be choosier as to what got published.  Today- there are more books being churned out (I'm guessing here) than say 30 years ago, editors take less time with each, and so we're drowning in books- mostly awful as I agree with you on Stephen King and Ann Coulter  (haven't read John Norman, sounds like he can be given a miss.)  I'll also lay long odds that with the more fragmented reading market, no single book has the market appeal of say Huck Finn over a century ago.  So economics rears its ugly head yet again.

So are there still good writers today?  Yep- one of the best novels I've ever read was Pattern Recognition by William Gibson, written not long ago.  And Khalid Hosseini's "The Kite Runner" packs a wallop, but neither of these novels has anywhere near the readership of the authors you mentioned from a century ago.

While our science and math educational system takes it on the chin, I'll point out that our education in literature is pretty lame too.  All too often, courses use books written by authors long dead, that simply aren't accessible to today's youth.  Nor should they be, authors don't write for posterity, they write for their current audience who will hopefully shell out for the damn book.  So give a kid a diet of Shakespeare, Faulkner, Melville, and Dickens, and you wind up with a kid who has trouble following the language since it's altered over the years, and may not often understand the underlying rationale behind the themes.  Romeo and Juliet is a wonderful love story, but the idea that a 13 and 14 year old are being forced not to wed because they're families are pissed is a bit tough to wrap your head around today.

Where I've noticed the biggest difference in writing over the past decades is in magazines.  Scientific American used to be written for a much more scientifically literate audience than it is today- the same is true of some of the hobby mags I read as well.  But other journals such as the Journal of the American Chemical Society show very little stylistic change over the past 5 decades or so, and there are lots of articles written there.  So I'm not so sure that we can't write as well although your comments about the troops may be telling- but haven't the troops gotten a lot younger over the years?  Also- the rates of literacy have risen, but that also means that there's more room at the bottom- hence it can look like the average letter written by a soldier isn't as eloquent as earlier times.  Maybe in earlier times, the less eloquent soldiers couldn't write at all?

Sam 

(in reply to sophia37)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 12:40:21 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
There's a lot of good information in here mixed with a lot of bad information.

Books were NOT more expensive thirty years ago.  There's conflicting information floating around about this because publishers don't want people to think that they're raising the cost of books--so they commission studies based on specific markets.  Overall, I'm convinced that the price of books has increased (relative to prices generally).

Editors do NOT take less time with books than they did thirty years ago.  The main difference is that certain book-buying audiences have dried up, so publishing a profitable book these days entails a lot more in the way of market research, whereas in the past editors were able to devote more of their time to choosing manuscripts on their intellectual merits.

And soldiers are NOT younger today than they were in the Civil War.  Far from it.  The difference is that an 18-year-old conscript in the 1860's had more writing experience than an 18-year-old today.  I don't know that I'd say their EDUCATION was better--by our standards, their education was sorely lacking in many respects--but teaching kids how to write was one thing they did better than we're doing today.

Otherwise, I'd agree that the best writing today is on par with the best writing in past eras, but the middle is a lot lower.  And that's what the OP was talking about, after all: the reading ability of AVERAGE Americans.  I can tell ya, it sucks.

quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct

Plus, back then, they were more expensive, and there were fewer writers- so editors could be choosier as to what got published.  Today- there are more books being churned out (I'm guessing here) than say 30 years ago, editors take less time with each, and so we're drowning in books- mostly awful as I agree with you on Stephen King and Ann Coulter  (haven't read John Norman, sounds like he can be given a miss.)  I'll also lay long odds that with the more fragmented reading market, no single book has the market appeal of say Huck Finn over a century ago.  So economics rears its ugly head yet again.

So are there still good writers today?  Yep- one of the best novels I've ever read was Pattern Recognition by William Gibson, written not long ago.  And Khalid Hosseini's "The Kite Runner" packs a wallop, but neither of these novels has anywhere near the readership of the authors you mentioned from a century ago.

While our science and math educational system takes it on the chin, I'll point out that our education in literature is pretty lame too.  All too often, courses use books written by authors long dead, that simply aren't accessible to today's youth.  Nor should they be, authors don't write for posterity, they write for their current audience who will hopefully shell out for the damn book.  So give a kid a diet of Shakespeare, Faulkner, Melville, and Dickens, and you wind up with a kid who has trouble following the language since it's altered over the years, and may not often understand the underlying rationale behind the themes.  Romeo and Juliet is a wonderful love story, but the idea that a 13 and 14 year old are being forced not to wed because they're families are pissed is a bit tough to wrap your head around today.

Where I've noticed the biggest difference in writing over the past decades is in magazines.  Scientific American used to be written for a much more scientifically literate audience than it is today- the same is true of some of the hobby mags I read as well.  But other journals such as the Journal of the American Chemical Society show very little stylistic change over the past 5 decades or so, and there are lots of articles written there.  So I'm not so sure that we can't write as well although your comments about the troops may be telling- but haven't the troops gotten a lot younger over the years?  Also- the rates of literacy have risen, but that also means that there's more room at the bottom- hence it can look like the average letter written by a soldier isn't as eloquent as earlier times.  Maybe in earlier times, the less eloquent soldiers couldn't write at all?


< Message edited by Lordandmaster -- 11/20/2007 12:41:59 PM >

(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 12:47:21 PM   
mefisto69


Posts: 370
Joined: 1/19/2007
Status: offline
The downfall began in the mid-70's with the advent of Whole language learning. PHONICS was ripped out of the program, and children began to memorize short sentences and were told they could then "read", when they were able to parrot them back. There have been two major modifications in US language arts since then....not much more successful.
Students were taught to 'be creative'..........spelling, punctuation, cohesion were thrown out the window. There hasn't been much improvement since the 70's in those areas either.
There has been NO imrovement in reading comprehension because the children canot learn to read. To compound the problem, current parents and yes.....current classroom teachers went through the same dis-educational system. Parents cannot or will not sit and prepare their children for school. Teachers simply can't 'get it'. Consequently, we have hundreds of reading specialists in every school system....guess what.......they went through the same system too,,,,,,,,,,nearly all of their 'reading strategies' discount the importance of Phonics. AS an aside.........every prospective class room teacher in the US only gets 1 (one) 3 credit course in the pedagogy of Phonics and are told to do the best they can with it.

Now, when the genius' diseducation leaders finally realized American students were tragiclly behind the ball in math and science, what did they do? Turn nearly ALL math problems into word (reading) problems......guess what? All that accomplished was a slew of NEW math methods, new textbooks and new Math-edubabble terminology. This.....for an educational concept that 95% of people DO NOT USE in adulthood.

Oh yes........math helps the student with critical thinking. Well, you should all be out tarring and feathering your dis educational leaders because THEY KNOW without a doubt that the formal study of Music/ Art does a much better job of helping a student grasp oblique concepts. Uh huh..in the past 100 years, there have been nearly 3000 studies performed on the affects of music on the brain. About 80% have been realized in the US. Most of these studies have been performed by Psychologists and Neuroscientists. They still haven't figured out the 'why' , the 'how'........but the test results show 'positive'.
Dis-educators discount all these findings because they cant pidgeon hole the results (yet)..............Neuro-science is still in it's infancy and time will prove their current results.

The bureaucrats also refuse to recognise findings of ETS......the company that produces the SAT. IE: for the past 40 years, students that studied a musical instrument ( or took art classes )( with a specialized teacher) and practiced each day for at least 30 minutes, consistently scored 3 to 9 percent Higher than the math and science whizzes ( combined) on SAT tests.

No human empire has survived beyond 200 years........and we are seriously on the downward slide.

(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 12:55:29 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
I hate to admit it, but after I got the internet, my book reading went down significantly.  Now much of the time I would have spent reading, I spend doing chat like this.

(in reply to mefisto69)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 1:02:46 PM   
childoftheshadow


Posts: 458
Joined: 8/2/2006
From: London UK
Status: offline
I'm a serious reader, averaging 2-3 books a week. I always have been like that, and I'm trying to teach my UM to be the same. Thankfully, the school here is very good, and my UM was confidently reading by her 5th birthday. I alson hand write all of my letters (up to 15 a week depending on my mood).

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 1:09:18 PM   
DiurnalVampire


Posts: 8125
Joined: 1/19/2006
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
My book reading is on average a book a week, depending on my work schedule, and company at the house
When I taught afterschool in NYC, I used to give little rewards for the children that could read a book and then give me a short report on what they read. Unfortunately, many children now dont read as much as we did when we were younger becaue they have no inspiration to. There are not as many good childrens books coming out anymore, and the classics dont hold the same interest to those now as they did. From early on, kids are plugged into the TV and babysat, and by the time they start to read they have so little imagination left to picture what they are reading that it doesnt appeal to them anymore. When I was younger, I had 1-2 hours of TV a day at best, and that was sesame street or something like it. Mom read to me, and I had books on vinal record that were "read alongs" that had a chirp to tell me when to turn the page so i could recognize the words and such. I think something like that, obviously in CD form now, would be great for the younger generation.  I just dont think they still make them.

DV


_____________________________

I will be your Dominate if you will be my submit - Fox

Snarko Ergo Sum
If you cannot change your mind, how are you so sure you still have one? -proverb

*Owner of Fox - collared 10/13/07*
VampiresLair

(in reply to childoftheshadow)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 1:13:02 PM   
childoftheshadow


Posts: 458
Joined: 8/2/2006
From: London UK
Status: offline
DV, I got my UM some read along books and CD's a couple of weeks ago. She loves them as the books are currently too hard for her to read herself, it keeps her busy and happy for ages.

(in reply to DiurnalVampire)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 1:18:10 PM   
cyberdude611


Posts: 2596
Joined: 5/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

Interesting. I wonder if this study takes into account the increased reading of internet material.




That's a good point because many libraries now have "e-books" which can read right off a computer screen.

More and more writers are also using the internet instead of print material. People used to write the editor and have it published in the newspaper. Now everyone has blogs. It's cheap. And you dont have anyone censoring the comments.

The reasons the younger generation is going to be easier to control has nothing to do with reading....its about not enough emphesis in schools concerning history and social sciences. I can say for a fact that I learned more in my first year in college than all 4 years of high school combined. High school was a complete joke. And this was the 1990s... from what I hear and see going on in schools today.....it's much worse.

I know people like to argue in favor of public schools but seriously....you don't get a good education unless you pay for it. That's just how it is. That's why kids in private schools score higher.

(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 2:03:09 PM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
Lord and Master

from : http://www.vetsoutreach.com/ptsd-history.html

"The Vietnam war could be called our first war fought by adolescents. The average age of World War II soldiers was 26 years. In contrast, the boys who left for Southeast Asia averaged 19.2 years of age. They were still in their formative years and most susceptible to the imprinting of the terrors of combat."

www.thomaslegion.net gives the average age of a civil war soldier at 26 as well.

AFAIK- the kids in Iraq aren't significantly older than the kids in Viet Nam.

In terms of book pricing- well a book today is about 20% cheaper than the cost of a movie- but IIRC, back in the 70s, I thought they were about the same (somewhere around $3.50?  But I don't think the cost of books is that significant compared with other pressures.  And it seems that we agree that editors ARE spending less time per book- at least in editing, since they're doing more market research these days.


Mefisto- wasn't there a nice Tom Lehr song about "New Math"?  I'm not sure I fully buy your argument that focusing on math hurts reading, but much of our educational expenditures have been on special ed kids who are very resource intensive, and we've wound up shortchanging the rest of the class.  I'll also agree that I find the cuts in music and art to be draconian- but that describes much of this administrations actions.  Gym classes have been cut too- and many of the same arguments could be made there- coupled with a ballooning weight problem of kids of all ages.  In short- our educational system is rather out of whack and many changes have been driven by ideology rather than prudence.

Sam 


(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 2:07:00 PM   
YourhandMyAss


Posts: 5516
Joined: 6/25/2006
From: Sacramento
Status: offline
I do. My pen pal and I exchange snail mail letters several times a month, we have for almost a year now. I also read a lot,  I have a book everywhere I go when I go places, and I was always reading inbetween classes and at lunch at when I finished assignments early in school. Now my writing skills are not the greatest, but I DO read all the time and I DO write snail mail letters.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Who still writes a real letter?  (And no, e-mail doesn't count.)  People are reading less and writing less, so it's not a huge surprise that their literacy is suffering.

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 2:15:30 PM   
BruisedHick


Posts: 123
Joined: 8/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mefisto69
No human empire has survived beyond 200 years........and we are seriously on the downward slide.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_empires

Way to read your history.

Yours,


benji

_____________________________

Guess who?

(in reply to mefisto69)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 3:26:07 PM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

There's a lot of good information in here mixed with a lot of bad information.

Editors do NOT take less time with books than they did thirty years ago.  The main difference is that certain book-buying audiences have dried up, so publishing a profitable book these days entails a lot more in the way of market research, whereas in the past editors were able to devote more of their time to choosing manuscripts on their intellectual merits.

I find a large number of errors that could be found by competent proofreaders.  From newspapers to hardcovers, companies appear to depend far, far to much on spellcheckers, missing mistakes that are spelled correctly.

It's much easier to publish books nowadays, leading to a lot of crap on the market.

thornhappy
voracious reader of most anything

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Decline in Reading - 11/20/2007 4:29:31 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

People's WRITING abilities have clearly declined too.  I first noticed this when I heard the letters that ordinary soldiers would write home during the Civil War series by Ken Burns.  Most ordinary Americans today simply would not be able to write like that.  But you can even see a decline over the last 20-30 years.  Whip out a highbrow newspaper from the 1960's or 70's and see how journalists used to write.  But who reads highbrow newspapers in 2007?  Who still writes a real letter?  (And no, e-mail doesn't count.)  People are reading less and writing less, so it's not a huge surprise that their literacy is suffering.


I noticed that too Loardandmaster... and back even further letters by Jefferson and Monroe were also eloquent. The handwriting was beautiful as well.

Notice how even as early as the 1940’s people spoke with eloquence…no slang and they wrote that was as well… we have lost a lot over the years and not for the best.

Butch

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Decline in Reading Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109