eyesopened
Posts: 2798
Joined: 6/12/2006 From: Tampa, FL Status: offline
|
It would depend on your definition of slave and your definition of ownership. In ancient Rome and in other more recent history, slaves never lived with their owners, but stayed in their own quarters. They are owned to serve. Period. Fast forward to 2007, here in the south there are LOTS of 'snowbirds' who own property here and other property in thier home state. The ownership of that property is never in question just because they are not physically residing in the house, and they only have to claim a primary residence for tax purposes. i am owned. i serve every day. my service is in how i conduct my life to honor my Master. We do not live together, we do not live in the same state. When i visit my Master, my service becomes more intimate but i am not less owned when i return to my home. i will not be more owned when i move in with Him, just happier.
_____________________________
Proudly owned by InkedMaster. He is the one i obey, serve, honor and love. No one is honored for what they've received. Honor is the reward for what has been given.
|