CuriousLord
Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thornhappyquote:
ORIGINAL: CuriousLord You see, "feminism", as it looks like, is a belief in females; more specifically, looking for women's rights. This phrase may be appropriate in which women lack rights as increasing them would be in line with equality. However, in a society of approximate equality, increasing a gender's rights is to be a supremacist for that gender; in feminism's case, female supremacy. I see feminism and chauvinism as two forms of sexism, as the cited article supports. As I mentioned in the previous post, "get it's the historical use for that word.. but time change, you know?" Telling, right? In my lifetime, a wife couldn't have her own credit history. It was linked to her husband's. They couldn't get birth control without the husband's approval. They could be told that "oh, the man needed the job because he's married and you would just be providing a second income" (happened to my mom). I've personally had to work with guys who didn't "believe in" women engineers. A prof stood over a woman taking an engineering exam and said "Why aren't you at home taking care of your husband?" (happened at my alma mater, I heard it from a guy who was in the class.) So, is it feminism to want an independent credit history? To want a fair chance on the job? To not take shit from a professor? Or is that female supremacy? Oops, now I'm sounding like an angry feminist. It could be that you hold a definition of feminism that is different from the accepted, common definition. My friend, I do not mean to be rude, but.. you're old, at least, compared to me. You grew up in a different world. That's how it was when you were growing up.. that's not the truth anymore. My definition isn't odd. At least, not in my age group. It's just the newer one that's more practical today, since, well, women not being able to vote or having their own credit history are things we only read about in History class. Times have changed, thornhappy.
|