teamnoir
Posts: 226
Joined: 4/5/2005 From: San Francisco Bay Area California Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: missturbation Not to be picky here but socially my friends etc except that i am Sirs slave so i do have a social relationship. I don't see that as social. I see that as a small group scene. Social would be when complete strangers agree that you do not have the right to leave the relationship on your own accord. Social would be when law enforcement and/or a court of law would return you to your owner if you ran away. quote:
Ok i dont support animal cruelty but it exists. Yes, it does. In that sense, slavery exists also, but it's a criminal act. Are you claiming to be involved in a criminal act? Are you asking for us to intervene on your behalf? If your answer to both of those questions is "no", then in my opinion, you are not a slave in the same sense as many black folks in america were once slaves, nor are you involved in modern day criminal "white slavery". Pick any term you like, but I find it necessary to distinguish your style of "slavery" from theirs. The two things are, in my opinion, significantly different. To me, the very context of your relationship is something other than what is claimed, and hence, while SM activity within that context may seem very real to you, and I recognize that to you it seems very real and not play-like at all, I see it as real only in the same sense that your relationship is exactly like the state of many black americans some time ago - which is to say, rather significantly different from "real". I'm not entirely comfortable saying that your slavery isn't real. I'm sure your relationship is real and that it includes some non-vanilla aspects that you think of as "slavery". However, I'm just as sure that it isn't the same thing as what black americans once experienced and I'm grasping for a word or phrase to clarify that distinction.
< Message edited by teamnoir -- 9/15/2007 2:26:23 PM >
|