|
MadameMarque -> RE: Dearly Departed (8/21/2007 4:05:28 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Celeste43 quote:
ORIGINAL: MadameMarque In such a situation, I would hope, and urge, that the submissive be transitioned to a reliable household, who are trusted and known by the owner or dominant, not to be owned by them, but as a haven, for her. Whether they are actually in the scene, or just scene-friendly, it is more important that the submissive be supported by good people, until fate and opportunity send her to the right person for her, at the right time, in the future. One could look upon this as a guardianship situation. All blessings to all those involved. Is she mentally incompetent that she needs a legal guardian? And do you really think the best thing for her is to lose not only her husband but also her own home? Would you give this advice to your mother should your father predecease her? You really believe people suffering from one loss will do best by having everything of their own removed from them by force? The fact that she's been able to nurse him to the end while handling all the household chores shows that she isn't incapable of making decisions. Um, no. I can only gather that your misinterpretation of my remarks is based around my use of the word, "guardianship." I did not mean "legal guardian," for someone incapacitated. I certainly did not intend to suggest that anything be removed from anybody, or that she lose her home, or that she is incapacitated...none of this has anything to do with my remarks, and again, I can only guess that you extrapolated from the word, "guardianship," to all these wrong conclusions. I only used the word to indicate that her staying among friends would be like a haven, and that, as her master seems to want her to be under someone's auspices, in his absence, he could view this as someone(s) "guarding over her," instead of her going directly to another master. Also, since he seems to want her to go directly into being owned, in another household, he may believe - and it may or may not be true - that she will suffer from not being in that dynamic with anyone, on top of other grief and trauma. As an alternative, that still seems in keeping with both his will and her will to honor his will, I'm suggesting, instead of her going, permanently, to a new master - in which case, all of her property really would be at risk, especially if the new master turned out to be a bad choice - I'm suggesting that, instead, she be among friends, for however long she needs the support. I'm suggesting that she stay with people that they already know (instead of looking among strangers), because they are more likely to be a good choice. For her to stay in another household, would not involve her giving up any of her possessions or household. But for her to stay among people, in their household, for however long she needs the support, especially people who understand the kind of relationship she has had, would hopefully fulfill a bit of that need to be under someone else's wing - if, indeed, she has that need - without going directly into being owned or dominated by another. This may or may not be a useful suggestion, to these two people. In all this, I am only speculating, based upon a few paragraphs of information. I only responded because it hurt me to think of the two of them, in the situation as it was described, and I was trying to suggest another approach, toward the same goal, of his taking the best care of her and her honoring his wishes, while still living true to her needs and feelings. And finally, your remarks about my family are not invited, informed, or appreciated. So, back off.
|
|
|
|