RE: Sad day in sports history (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Sinergy -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 8:16:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

I'd be more impressed if he could do it the way Babe Ruth did; fat, out of shape, and with a hangover.


Dont forget on a larger field, with more primitive equipment.

Sinergy




SwitchMaleChgo -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 8:16:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

quote:

Truth is steroids don't do anything unless you have pushed yourself to your limit - only then do they begin to assist.


No, steroids make possible  unattainable hypertrophy with crappy form, mediocre workouts, and scant attention to rest and nutrition cycles.. which is why they are so popular. They are a big short cut. They also allow coaches to win with players who might otherwise be sidelined too long from injuries.

If you had to already be a champion to get a microscopic benefit, they wouldn't be in currency with every gym rat who thinks squats are too hard, and strict form is for losers.


Let's say that's true - Bonds did not make the world record with crappy form, mediocre workouts, and scant attention to rest and nutrition. Besides - there are a lot of substances that can hurt you if you don't follow other advisable protocols but they are not illegal. Fundementally there is talent and learned skill there. Also let me reinterate that I only think steroids should be legal for adult men for which studies show benifit.




SwitchMaleChgo -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 8:17:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

I'd be more impressed if he could do it the way Babe Ruth did; fat, out of shape, and with a hangover.


I've got to give that one to you!




Alumbrado -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 8:19:55 AM)

I wasn't arguing that Bonds would never have broken the record without chemical help..his talent is obvious.  It may have taken longer. 

But I did want to offer a counterview to the notion that only those who already give a superb effort borne of immense talent will see any benefit from steroids.  




SwitchMaleChgo -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 8:22:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

I wasn't arguing that Bonds would never have broken the record without chemical help..his talent is obvious.  It may have taken longer. 

But I did want to offer a counterview to the notion that only those who already give a superb effort borne of immense talent will see any benefit from steroids.  


Noted and partially agreed. In my experience people who do steroids half assed though don't keep what they got so I guess I was factoring that in. I'll give a little bit on my statement.




Alumbrado -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 8:30:32 AM)

Or they end up with 22 inch biceps and birdlegs [;)]




SwitchMaleChgo -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 8:32:23 AM)

On an unrelated note - check out the link I posted earlier if you have time. It's facinating and asks a lot of very interesting questions.




DomKen -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 8:36:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SwitchMaleChgo
Let me clarify. I do not think steroids should be legal for teenagers or for women (unless a sepcific medical condition merits it). But as for developed men - all studies suggest their use to be benifitial however we are denied these substances because of a war-on-drugs type mentality that jumps on hype instead of looking at the evidence. Watch this video. If it doesn't change you mind or at least make you consider rethinking the whole issue then I will respect your opinion but retain my own. Too each their own as they say.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2754168929523377644&q=steroid&total=2888&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=9

What studies? The ones that prove anabolic steroids can cause fatal liver damage? Or perhaps its the ones that prove anabolic steroids can cause sterility and development of female secondary sexual characteristics? Or maybe you mean the ones that show that anabolic steroids are associated with a variety of self and other endangering psychological changes?

Or maybe you'd rather go with the anecdotal evidence? Maybe interviews with Lyle Alzado and Chris Benoit will be helpful? Then again maybe not. Although if you hurry you can interview "Superstar" Billy Graham on his admitted anabolic steroid use but I would wait very long if I was you.

As to Gumbel's little "news" report it would be more interesting and relevant if I didn't actually know how to use pubmed. A quick search of:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez
shows 5400+ articles on anabolic steroids and mixed in with the studies on how to detect it are plenty of articles on the damage it causes. I count 6 on the first page of 20 results.




Alumbrado -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 8:42:56 AM)

There was a pharmacist on the skeptic's forum who provided links to similar material... and no doubt that hysteria co-exists with denial on the subject.  


Now as to 'healthy adult males', that would include my son when he was 18, and his coaches realized that as a natural talent, he was a career booster for them...on steroids, he would have been their meal ticket. Good thing we had had a long time to teach him to think for himself, and sift through the hype from both sides.




SwitchMaleChgo -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 8:56:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: SwitchMaleChgo
Let me clarify. I do not think steroids should be legal for teenagers or for women (unless a sepcific medical condition merits it). But as for developed men - all studies suggest their use to be benifitial however we are denied these substances because of a war-on-drugs type mentality that jumps on hype instead of looking at the evidence. Watch this video. If it doesn't change you mind or at least make you consider rethinking the whole issue then I will respect your opinion but retain my own. Too each their own as they say.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2754168929523377644&q=steroid&total=2888&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=9

What studies? The ones that prove anabolic steroids can cause fatal liver damage? Or perhaps its the ones that prove anabolic steroids can cause sterility and development of female secondary sexual characteristics? Or maybe you mean the ones that show that anabolic steroids are associated with a variety of self and other endangering psychological changes?

Or maybe you'd rather go with the anecdotal evidence? Maybe interviews with Lyle Alzado and Chris Benoit will be helpful? Then again maybe not. Although if you hurry you can interview "Superstar" Billy Graham on his admitted anabolic steroid use but I would wait very long if I was you.

As to Gumbel's little "news" report it would be more interesting and relevant if I didn't actually know how to use pubmed. A quick search of:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez
shows 5400+ articles on anabolic steroids and mixed in with the studies on how to detect it are plenty of articles on the damage it causes. I count 6 on the first page of 20 results.


There is a difference between use and abuse. Alcohol causes liver damage too. Besides liver problems is noramlly (not exclusively) an issue with 17AA oral steroids which no educated person would take for more than 4 weeks.

Female secondary sex characteristic only develope if you ABUSE AAS or are prone to it (bitch tits) but even that is managable thorugh anti-estrogens. As for physcological changes - you have to consider the type of person who normally is going to use them with their current illegal status. Many are of troubled social background before taking them.

USE and ABUSE are two different things. An intelligent program apllied to adult males has it's benefits. And many of the of the problem we men have as we age which simply accept as being part of aging don't need to happen.




SwitchMaleChgo -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 9:02:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

There was a pharmacist on the skeptic's forum who provided links to similar material... and no doubt that hysteria co-exists with denial on the subject.  


Now as to 'healthy adult males', that would include my son when he was 18, and his coaches realized that as a natural talent, he was a career booster for them...on steroids, he would have been their meal ticket. Good thing we had had a long time to teach him to think for himself, and sift through the hype from both sides.


18 is too young IMO. He'd still be at a hornomal peek. I'm refering more to men in their 30's begin the downslide.  




cyberdude611 -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 10:36:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SwitchMaleChgo

right. Steroids won the record. It had nothing to do with natural talent or hard training. Listen - if you have no talent and take steroids it doesn't give you talent. If you take steroids and sit on your ass they do not build muscle. Truth is steroids don't do anything unless you have pushed yourself to your limit - only then do they begin to assist. He still had the work to do. He still had to train and push himself to his absolute limit. Steroids or not. He deserves the honor. Every sport in history has had their cheats and I'm sure Aaron isn't immune. If every bat Aaron ever used has been X-ray'd to see if it was corked then maybe I'm wrong. But I'm guessing a corked bat or two made it in his record and just no one knows about it. Give Bonds his due. Steroids should be legal anyway.


Maybe you should tell this to the International Olympic Committee. You get just even one positive test with them, you are banned from the Olympics for life. It has happened and they have done it.

Steroid testing is increasing...they are now starting to crack down on high school athletes and test them.

You can try and defend it all you want, but the vast majority of people link steroids with cheating. And you arn't going to change anyone's mind on that.




SwitchMaleChgo -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 10:49:48 AM)

Im not here to change anyone's mind. Only speak mine.




OrionTheWolf -> RE: Sad day in sports history (8/9/2007 4:44:28 PM)

NEW YORK (SI.com) -- Beginning in 1998 with injections in his buttocks of Winstrol, a powerful steroid, Barry Bonds took a wide array of performance-enhancing drugs over at least five seasons in a massive doping regimen that grew more sophisticated as the years went on, according to Game of Shadows, a book written by two San Francisco Chronicle reporters at the forefront of reporting on the BALCO steroid distribution scandal.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/baseball/mlb/03/06/news.excerpt/index.html




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375